马克思主义的

From the basic standpoints of Marxism, based on the new achievement in Marxist research, using the method of textualism, the paper analyses the contents and the logical relations of the early Baudrillard's four texts: The System of Objects, The Consumer Society, For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign and The Mirror of Production.

本文从马克思主义哲学基本观点出发，以国内外马克思主义哲学研究最新成果为依托，通过文本学解读的方法，对早期鲍德里亚处于西方马克思主义影响之下的四个理论文本——《物体系》、《消费社会》、《符号政治经济学批判》和《生产之镜》——的内容及其内在逻辑关系进行了分析。

The historicity that Marx advocated in the sense of philosophical ontology is not equal to historicism,therefore Marxists must reject the phronesis of Kantian epistemolog y,and construct the historical ontology of Marx sphilosophy,and so as to show the full truth of Marxist social and historical theory.

马克思主义哲学本体论意义上倡言的历史性不等于历史主义，马克思主义哲学必须放弃康德式近代认识论的思路，打造出一种历史本体论来，方可尽显马克思主义社会历史理论的真义。

Historicity that Marx advocated in the sense of philosophical ontology is not equal to historicism,therefore Marxists must reject the phronesis of Kantian epistemology,and construct the historical ontology of Marx'sphilosophy,and so as to show the full truth of Marxist social and historical theory.

马克思主义本体论意义上倡言的性不等于历史主义，马克思主义哲学必须放弃康德式近代认识论的思路，打造出一种历史本体论来，方可尽显马克思主义历史的真义。

The historicity that Marx advocated in the sense of philosophical ontology is not equal to historicism,therefore Marxists must reject the phronesis of Kantian epistemology,and construct the historical ontology of Marx'sphilosophy,and so as to show the full truth of Marxist social and historical theory.

马克思主义哲学本体论意义上倡言的历史性不便是历史主义，马克思主义哲学必须放弃康德式近代相识论的思绪，打造出一种历史本体论来，方可尽显马克思主义社会历史理论的真义。

The historicity that Marx advocated in the sense of philosophical ontology is not equal to historicism,therefore Marxists must reject the phronesis of Kantian epistemology,and construct the historical ontology of Marx'sphilosophy,and so as to show the full truth of Marxist social and historical theory.

马克思主义哲学本体论意义上倡言的历史性不等于历史主义，马克思主义哲学必须放弃康德式近代认识论的思路，打造出一种历史本体论来，方可尽显马克思主义社会历史理论的真义。

The historicity that Marx advocated in the sense of philosophical ontology is not equal to historicism,therefore Marxists must reject the phronesis of Kantian epistemology,and construct the historical ontology of Marx'sphilosophy,and so as to show the full truth of Marxist social and historical theory.

马克思主义哲学本体论意义上倡言的历史性不等于历史主义，马克思主义哲学必须放弃康德式近代熟悉论的思路，打造出一种历史本体论来，方可尽显马克思主义社会历史理论的真义。

Http://www.lwlm.com The historicity that Marx advocated in the sense of philosophical ontology is not equal to historicism,therefore Marxists must reject the phronesis of Kantian epistemology,and construct the historical ontology of Marx'sphilosophy,and so as to show the full truth of Marxist social and historical theory.

马克思主义哲学本体论意义上倡言的历史性不等于历史主义，马克思主义哲学必须放弃康德式近代认识论的思路，打造出一种历史本体论来，方可尽显马克思主义社会历史理论的真义。

The historicity that Marx advocated in the sense of philosophical ontology is not equal to historicism,therefore Marxists must reject the phronesis of Kantian epistemology,and construct the historical ontology of Marxsphilosophy,and so as to show the full truth of Marxist social and historical theory.

马克思主义哲学本体论意义上倡言的历史性不等于历史主义，马克思主义哲学必须放弃康德式近代认识论的思路，打造出一种历史本体论来，方可尽显马克思主义社会历史理论的真义。

The historicity that Marx advocated in the sense of philosophical ontology is not equal to historicism,therefore Marxists must reject the phronesis of Kantian epistemology,and construct the historical ontology of Marx'sphilosophy,and so as to show the full truth of Marxist social and historical theory.

马克思主义哲学本体论意义上倡言的历史不即是历史主义，马克思主义哲学必须放弃康德式近代相识论的思绪，打造出一种历史本体论来，方可尽显马克思主义社会历史理论的真义。

The historicity that Marx advocated in the sense of philosophical ontology is not equal to historicism,therefore Marxists must reject the phronesis of Kantian epistemology,and construct the historical ontology of Marx'sphilosophy,and so as to show the full truth of Marxist social and historical theory.

马克思主义哲学本体论意义上倡言的历史性不就是历史主义，马克思主义哲学必需抛却康德式近代了解论的思路，打造出一种历史本体论来，方可尽显马克思主义社会历史理论的真义。

We have no common name for a mime of Sophron or Xenarchus and a Socratic Conversation; and we should still be without one even if the imitation in the two instances were in trimeters or elegiacs or some other kind of verse--though it is the way with people to tack on 'poet' to the name of a metre, and talk of elegiac-poets and epic-poets, thinking that they call them poets not by reason of the imitative nature of their work, but indiscriminately by reason of the metre they write in.

索夫农 、森那库斯和苏格拉底式的对话采用的模仿没有一个公共的名称；三音步诗、挽歌体或其他类型的诗的模仿也没有——人们把&诗人&这一名词和格律名称结合到一起，称之为挽歌体诗人或者史诗诗人，他们被称为诗人，似乎只是因为遵守格律写作，而非他们作品的模仿本质。

The relationship between communicative competence and grammar teaching should be that of the ends and the means.

交际能力和语法的关系应该是目标与途径的关系。