预先分配的东西

But Baumol has not reckoned with my contention that, all microeconomic price details aside, when we properly transform from rate-of-surplus-value accounting regime to actual rate-of-competitive-profit regime, we take an eraser and replace the a0-1(1+r*) m=1 relation that defines "the rate of surplusvalue, r*" by the alternative relation a0(1+R*)[I-a(1+R*)]-1 m=1 that defines the "competitive rate of profit, R*;" and literally nothing in the way of understanding of the latter's actual distribution relation is "revealed," is "uncovered" or is "laid bare" by the pre-eraser detouring.

但是鲍莫尔没有考虑到我的这一观点，将所有微观经济价格细节放在一边，当我们适当的将剩余价值率清算体制转化为实际的竞争利润率体制，我们就拿出一块橡皮并将a0-1(1+r*)m=1这一关系式替换成a0(1+R*)[I-a(1+R*)]-1m=1这一关系式，在关于后者的实际的分配关系的理解上，字面上没有任何东西被预先擦掉的弯路&揭示&、&揭露&或&暴露&出来。

We have no common name for a mime of Sophron or Xenarchus and a Socratic Conversation; and we should still be without one even if the imitation in the two instances were in trimeters or elegiacs or some other kind of verse--though it is the way with people to tack on 'poet' to the name of a metre, and talk of elegiac-poets and epic-poets, thinking that they call them poets not by reason of the imitative nature of their work, but indiscriminately by reason of the metre they write in.

索夫农 、森那库斯和苏格拉底式的对话采用的模仿没有一个公共的名称；三音步诗、挽歌体或其他类型的诗的模仿也没有——人们把&诗人&这一名词和格律名称结合到一起，称之为挽歌体诗人或者史诗诗人，他们被称为诗人，似乎只是因为遵守格律写作，而非他们作品的模仿本质。

The relationship between communicative competence and grammar teaching should be that of the ends and the means.

交际能力和语法的关系应该是目标与途径的关系。