非法据为己有

The crime by takingadvantage of duty includes illegal arrogation to oneself,use(embezzlement,misappropriation and abuse)and so on.

侵财型职务犯罪包括非法据为己有和非法使用等类型。

Go in for sth in a large scale the court adjudicates finally, cao Wei ignores national law, it is a purpose with detinue, those who use a post, this unit debt illegal glom on to, amount is huge, its behavior already made functionary embezzlement crime.

大兴法院最后判决，曹威无视国法，以非法占有为目的，利用职务之便，将本单位钱款非法据为己有，数额巨大，其行为已构成职务侵占罪。

Xu Ting is very clear when taking money its are not had overdraw functional bank has more than yuan 170 only on card, the input when he takes a money for the first time takes an instruction 1000 yuan pure belong to innocently, after be being buckled 1 yuan, his much 999 yuan are belonged to civil those who go up is undeserved benefit; But, he knows perfectly well these 999 yuan not only later is not he deserved belongings will still its glom on to, and the identifying that uses an ATM is wrong, occupy promising purpose to be inputted intentionally 170 times continuously again with ill will exceed its the instruction ill will of amount of real bank savings takes a money, its behavior is belonged to trade by the contract the crime that behavior derives, accord with " criminal law " the 224th of the 5th regulation " it is a purpose with detinue, in sign, in fulfilling contract process, with property of the opposing party of other method diddle " of contract crime of fraud make important document.

许霆在取钱时很清楚其不具备透支功能的银行卡上只有170余元，他第一次取款时输入1000元取款指令纯属无意，被扣1元后，他多得的999元属于民事上的不当得利；但是，之后他不仅明知该999元不是自己应得财产仍将其据为己有，而且利用柜员机的识别错误，以恶意占有为目的又连续170次故意输入超出其实际存款数额的指令恶意取款，其行为属于由合同交易行为衍生出的刑事犯罪，符合《刑法》第224条第5项规定的"以非法占有为目的，在签订、履行合同过程中，以其他方法骗取对方当事人财物的"合同诈骗罪的构成要件。

But have the actual money value because of the virtual property, some illegal members are then in the come-on of benefits and order about under adopt various illegal means, go to the law fact that all virtual wealth of others appropriate to oneself in the actuality widespread existence, however because of conceptual reason of law, virtual property in the property position that the our country cans not get the law approbation over a long period of time, with fulfillment in a lot of virtual properties of occurrence violate the case, victimize the person and can't get the in time valid protection and fair treat fairly, then cause some more seriously social problem.

但是由于虚拟财产具有实际的金钱价值，一些不法分子便在利益的诱惑和驱使下采用各种非法手段，将他人所有的虚拟财富据为己有的法律事实在现实中普遍存在，然而由于法律概念上的原因，虚拟财产在我国长期得不到法律认可的财产地位，以至实践中发生很多虚拟财产侵害案，受害人不能得到及时有效的保护和公平公正的对待，进而引发一些更为严重的社会问题。

Xu Ting is very clear when taking money its are not had overdraw functional bank has more than yuan 170 only on card, the input when he takes a money for the first time takes an instruction 1000 yuan pure belong to innocently, after be being buckled 1 yuan, his much 999 yuan are belonged to civil those who go up is undeserved benefit; But, he knows perfectly well these 999 yuan not only later is not he deserved belongings will still its glom on to, and the identifying that uses an ATM is wrong, occupy promising purpose to be inputted intentionally 170 times continuously again with ill will exceed its the instruction ill will of amount of real bank savings takes a money, its behavior is belonged to trade by the contract the crime that behavior derives, accord with " criminal law " the 224th of the 5th regulation " it is a purpose with detinue, in sign, in fulfilling contract process, with property of the opposing party of other method diddle " of contract crime of fraud make important document.

许霆在取钱时很清楚其不具备透支功能的银行卡上只有170余元，他第一次取款时输入1000元取款指令纯属无意，被扣1元后，他多得的999元属于民事上的不当得利；但是，之后他不仅明知该999元不是自己应得财产仍将其据为己有，而且利用柜员机的识别错误，以恶意占有为目的又连续170次故意输入超出其实际存款数额的指令恶意取款，其行为属于由合同交易行为衍生出的刑事犯罪，符合《刑法》第224条第5项规定的&以非法占有为目的，在签订、履行合同过程中，以其他方法骗取对方当事人财物的&合同诈骗罪的构成要件。

In the negative and interrogative forms, of course, this is identical to the non-emphatic forms.

。但是，在否定句或疑问句里，这种带有"do"的方法表达的效果却没有什么强调的意思。

Go down on one's knees;kneel down

屈膝跪下。。。下跪祈祷