辞

Why ,he doesn't even have a belly-button.

谲辞：用来掩饰真情的假话鸣做谲辞。

And most scholars agree that this the "copulative" is in the silk "copulative" basis and the integration of other parts of the text editor from the.

而大多数的学者都认为，今本《系辞》是在帛书《系辞》的基础上，又融合了其它部分的文字编辑而成的。

But the silk book "copulative" and Tongxing Ben "copulative" compiled by age, who should and who next?

但帛书《系辞》和通行本《系辞》编撰的时代，谁先谁后？

If there is a Tongxing Ben as a "copulative" and "said the Gua" as the master copy, it can be copied wrong, there are omissions, there can be paragraphs before and after the move, but can not explain all of it,"Yi Yi's", etc. 3 referenced in those paragraphs, it is no longer in the silk,"copulative" and allowed to re-emerge.

如果有一个通行本那样的《系辞》与《说卦》作为底本，它可以抄错，有疏漏，也可以有段落前后的移动，但无法解释，所有它在《易之义》等三篇中引用的那些段落，它就不再在帛《系辞》中让其重新出现。

But this requires the default one premise: copying in the copy "copulative" before known of these paragraphs have been "easy to meaning" and other chapter excerpt, and it is not copied; or that he intentionally left them let " Yi Yi's "and so on to copy, not copy the" copulative "on.

但这需要预设一个前提：抄写者在抄《系辞》之前，已知这些段落都已被《易之义》等篇摘抄了，故不再抄了；或者他故意留下这些让《易之义》等来抄，而不抄在《系辞》上。

Comparing Tongxing Ben "copulative downstream" and "Yi Yi's" and other relevant paragraphs of the same can be found,"Yi Yi's" and so on with Zhanshi more closely linked, and Tongxing Ben "copulative" blunders abridged the deletion.

比较通行本《系辞下传》与《易之义》等的有关段落，同样可以发现，《易之义》等与占筮有更密切的联系，而通行本《系辞》则把它删节、删改了。

And "Tai Chi" was, then the first in the "I" In due course, and I direct our God the "Zhuangzi""Yizhuan copulative" in "Tai Chi" Silk "copulative" to "Daheng."

而"太极"一词，则最早见于《老子》稍后的、直接秉承老子旨意的《庄子》（《易传·系辞》中的"太极"，帛书《系辞》作"大恒"。

Silk books,"copulative" late out of the speaker that "Yi Yi's","to" the relevant paragraphs are copied from the Tongxing Ben "copulative", which says there is a great difficulty is:"easy to meaning,"" to "all the many passages copied from the Tongxing Ben is hardly a repeat appears in it has copied the" copulative "and.

帛书《系辞》晚出说者认为《易之义》、《要》的有关段落，皆抄自通行本《系辞》，此说有一很大的困难是：在《易之义》、《要》中的所有抄自通行本的许多段落，却无一重复地出现于它已抄的《系辞》中。

A distinction is made between content words, function words and derivational words to specify word formation of the 'Amis language.

内容主要在於区别实辞、虚辞及衍生辞的差异，分析说明语辞形构的规则。

The section on ci will discuss the descriptive function of ci, normative requirements placed upon ci, and the compositionality of ci and its semantic rules.

辞」的部分则讨论「辞」的描述性作用、对「辞」的规范性要求、以及「辞」的建构性和语意规则。

The split between the two groups can hardly be papered over.

这两个团体间的分歧难以掩饰。

This approach not only encourages a greater number of responses, but minimizes the likelihood of stale groupthink.

这种做法不仅鼓励了更多的反应，而且减少跟风的可能性。