误称

The 'arrival' of Sisyphus means that he has to employ 'pathetic fallacy' to personify the stone as signifying man's desire and mental burden – the stone lying at the roadside has been changed and elevated to a symbolic level, which incorporates the myth with heroic spirit and becomes the objective equivalent to that of desire, anxiety, and pressure. In essence, the physical features are drowned and from between to express the natural physical features or the ideas, he chooses the latter. This means that there is disjoint between what originally moved him and what he would like to express, but he is acutely aware of it – the 'danger of illustration'. We can see that these series of paintings are finally presented to us, the physical features of the objects still remains and are expressed to some extent. Among them some directly depict the stones in their own part about their pleats and points, desolateness and heaviness; at the meantime, nobody appears in the pictures.

西西弗斯的&到来&，意味着他不得不采用感情误置的方式，将石头进行拟人化的处理，用以指称人的欲望和精神负担——那块路边的石头已经不复它本来的面目，它被提升到一个象征的位置上，与神话和英雄的精神题旨迅速结合在一起，成为人性之中欲望、焦虑、压力等情感的客观对应物，从本质上来说，物自身的特性被淹没了，在表现物的自然特性和表现理念这两者之间，他选择了后者，这意味着，在感动他的最初事实与他要表现的事实之间就有了一种脱节，但他敏感地意识到了这种脱节，这种&图解的危险&，我们可以看到，当这组画最终呈现在我们面前的时候，物的自然特性得到了很大程度的挽留和表现，其中有一些画作直接描绘了岩石本身，它本身的褶皱和棱角、苍凉和沉重，同时，并没有人出现在这样的画面上。

But we don't care about Battlegrounds.

但我们并不在乎沙场中的显露。

Ah! don't mention it, the butcher's shop is a horror.

啊！不用提了。提到肉，真是糟透了。