诉讼当事人

In civil proceedings,procedural justice principle requires court to protect the equal position of parties,not only to inactively treat both parties but also to help weak party by using "attacking and defending methods".

在民事诉讼中，程序正义原则要求法院保障当事人诉讼地位平等，不仅应消极对待双方当事人，而且要积极辅助在"攻击防御方法"掌控上出于弱势的一方当事人。

In this paper I compare and study of pre-trial preparation outside the civil system and inspect the reform on the judicial practice and development of the system of pre-trial preparations of the thread, try to improve our pre-trial preparation process to find a feasible path, and the corresponding theoretical ideas. The main ideas are: First, in building a well-prepared pre-trial procedures, we must first solve the problem of litigation patterns" change and the introduction of partyism litigation concept; Second, establishing the indicting and replying procedures and replying losing rights rules, which are suitable for China"s national conditions; Third, redistributing the powers of judges and the parties and enhance the status of the main parties, further strengthen the parties evidence-gathering capability; Fourth, reshaping our mediation system.

本文比较研究了域外的民事审前准备制度，考察了我国司法实践中关于审前准备制度的改革和发展的脉络，力图找到完善我国审前准备程序的可行路径，并提出了相应的理论设想，主要有：第一，在我国构建完善的审前准备程序，首先要解决的问题是诉讼模式的转轨和当事人主义诉讼理念的引进；第二，确立适合我国国情的诉答程序以及答辩失权制度；第三，重新分配法官和当事人的权限，提升当事人的主体地位，进一步加强当事人的证据收集能力；第四，重塑我国的调解制度。

Nowadays, in our country, the system of pretrial preparation is in the beginning stage with only some preparation work for opening the court session, such as service of litigious documents, informing rights and obligations of parties, noticing litigants innerving action and etc, which is unable to launch the parties to positively intervene, or to find the best path to solve the dispute.

我国目前民事诉讼制度中审前准备制度还处在&准备阶段&，只是为开庭审理做一些准备性的工作，如送达诉讼文书、告知当事人权利与义务、通知当事人到庭参加诉讼等等，而没有程序本身发动各方当事人积极参加诉讼、寻求最佳解决纠纷途径的作用。

The legitimized procedures are bound to have their practical requirements of rationality.

得以合法化的诉讼程序势必有其合理性实践诉求，对此，本文结合诉讼程序两种实践模式——职权主义和当事人主义——所表征的两种合理性内涵，指明职权主义程序模式的工具合理性性质和当事人主义程序模式的规范合理性性质，并认为它们都是单向度体现了诉讼程序的合理性精神。

With regard to the lack of corresponding entity right backing for "execute the third party" according to the procedure law in current Chinese creditor"s subrogation system;the inconsistence between the entity law and the procedure law for the conditions to exercise creditor"s subrogation;the obscure effect of the exercising of the creditor"s subrogation;the indefiniteness of right and status of the parties in the subrogation proceeding and so on,it is suggested that amend the civil code,confine the creditor"s subrogation system,coordinate the rules in entity law and procedure law related to the debtees" to exercise their subrogation,define the creditor"s subrogation,the right and obligation of related parties in the procedure,perfect the rules in procedure law in order to provide proceeding procedure security for the realization of the creditors subrogation.

并针对我国现行债权人代位权制度在程序法中&执行第三人&缺乏相应实体权利依据、实体法与程序法有关债权人代位权行使条件规定不一致、债权人行使代位权效力不清、当事人在代位权诉讼中的地位和权利不明确等诸多缺欠，提出了制定民法典确定债权人代位权制度、协调实体法和程序法中关于债权人行使代位权的规定、明确债权人代位权诉讼相关当事人的权利义务、完善程序法规定为债权人代位权实现提供诉讼程序保障的意见。

At last, we have studied the conditions and classifications of litigants as evidences.

由此，还对诉讼当事人作为证据的条件和分类作了研究。

The original intention of the system to protect the legitimate rights and interests of litigants.

制度的初衷对保障诉讼当事人的合法权益，提高审判人员的素质和确保案件得到公正的审理无疑具有积极意义。

If all state venues are exhausted , litigants may appeal to the United States Supreme Court, the

如果州的司法途径被用尽，诉讼当事人可以将案件上诉到美国的最高法院。

In this chapter,on the base of discussingcomprehensively the three subjects of the Adversary Principle,andcombining with the practice of the reform of the civil trial style,thewriter holds that the non-binding Adversary Principle that is beingpracticed for the time being in our country is not the Adversary Principleof its essence,and it should be changed to be the binding standard to boththe court and the parties.On this,the writer have given the followingdefinite suggestions:First,the parties' claim acts should be controlledunder the law,and cannot be exercised for the objectives of delaying theproceedings or raising the action cost,otherwise will suffer losing hisright,or will be punished economically;Second,in order to reflectthe fairness of the action,and prevent the delay of the process,in thecivil procedure field of our country the timely evidence producism shouldbe carried out and implemented,and the evidence-production deadlinesystem should also be set up.Furthermore,to the parties that produceevidence out of time,hewill be deprived of attack and defense,orwill be given certain economic sanctions; Third,scientific admissionsystem should be set up,and to the admission withdrawal or statementscontradictory to the admission,should give legal restrictions orprohibitions.

本章中，作者在全面论述辩论原则三大命题的基础上，结合我国民事审判方式改革的实践，认为我国目前推行的非约束性辩论原则并非本质意义上的辩论原则，应将其转变为对法院和当事人的约束性规范原则，并在此基础上提出了如下具体建议：第一，当事人主张行为应受法律控制，不得以拖延诉讼、增加诉讼成本等为目的予以实施，否则将遭受失权效或经济上的诉讼制裁；第二，为体现诉讼公平，防止诉讼迟延，在我国民事诉讼领域应当推行和贯彻证据的适时提出主义，设置具有法律后果的举证时效制度，并对当事人违反举证时效制度的提供证据行为采取或取消其攻击防御方法，或课以其一定经济性制裁的惩罚措施；第三，设定科学的自认制度，对撤销自认或与自认相抵触的陈述应给予法律上的限制或禁止。

In such predicaments the source to which the English litigant turned was the Court of Chancery ,presided over by the Lord Chancellor .

处此逆境，英国的诉讼当事人可以求援的源泉，就是由大法官主持的衡平法法院

We have no common name for a mime of Sophron or Xenarchus and a Socratic Conversation; and we should still be without one even if the imitation in the two instances were in trimeters or elegiacs or some other kind of verse--though it is the way with people to tack on 'poet' to the name of a metre, and talk of elegiac-poets and epic-poets, thinking that they call them poets not by reason of the imitative nature of their work, but indiscriminately by reason of the metre they write in.

索夫农 、森那库斯和苏格拉底式的对话采用的模仿没有一个公共的名称；三音步诗、挽歌体或其他类型的诗的模仿也没有——人们把&诗人&这一名词和格律名称结合到一起，称之为挽歌体诗人或者史诗诗人，他们被称为诗人，似乎只是因为遵守格律写作，而非他们作品的模仿本质。

The relationship between communicative competence and grammar teaching should be that of the ends and the means.

交际能力和语法的关系应该是目标与途径的关系。