证明

Innovative Results】Based on study on colorectal cancer screening in Xiacheng district,the results have showed that①The CRC screening in urban area based on guideline established by our units had the same good results as in rural area.High risk factors questionnaire investigation had important role in CRC screening and it can make up the shortcomings of iFOBT and detect nonbleeding lesions,especially precancerous lesions such as adenomas and polyps;②Each high risk factor was sorted according to sensitivity and specificity for the first time among natural population in city.

通过对下城区大肠癌筛查的研究①首次证明来自于中小城市农村的大肠癌筛查方案对城市社区自然人群与中小城市农村的自然人群一样具有较好的检出效果，证明了问卷调查对大肠癌筛查的重要作用，能弥补iFOBT不足，发现其不能检出的包括不出血病变，尤其是腺瘤、息肉；②首次在城市社区自然人群中对各高危项目根据诊断的敏感度及特异度进行了排序。

The Lynn White debate, which begun when White called for a rethinking of Christianity or its replacement by a nonWestern religion, has proved an obstacle to dealing with the environmental crisis The defense of Christianity that followed inhibited Asian and comparative environmental ethics in the West and did not produce environmentally useful results Whenever the relationship of religion and the environment was raised, the discussion quickly shifted to the issue of Christian responsibility for the environmental crisis The problem with the debate is that in many important ways, the White thesis is correct: Christianity is indeed responsible to a significant degree in that Christianity desacralized nature and it supported policies politically in the Middle Ages that encouraged now harmful human population growth and promoted science and technology, much of which has proved to be environmentally problematic There was nevertheless a second tradition of which Saint Francis of Assisi was a part that was environmentally friendly and that could be useful in rethinking Christianity environmentally It is however unlikely that Christianity will prove useful in the development of an environmental ethic in nonWestern countries or that nonWestern religions will succeed in producing an environmental ethic in the West It is therefore important that religious scholars move beyond assigning blame for the environmental crisis and find ways for the major world religions to help develop environmental ethics as best they can within their own cultural spheres

林恩怀特争论始于怀特关于对基督教进行重新思考或者由非西方宗教取而代之的呼吁。林恩怀特争论已经被证明成为处理环境危机的一个障碍。由此而起的对基督教的辩护制约了亚洲和其他比较环境伦理学在西方的发展，没有产生对环境有益的结果。无论何时，当人们谈及宗教和环境的关系的时候，讨论都会迅速转向有关基督教对环境危机责任的讨论。这一争论的关键在于，怀特的论文在很多方面是对的：基督教的确在相当大的程度上造成了自然的世俗化，并且在中世纪，基督教在政治上对现在看来有害的人口增长的政策提供了支持，促进了科学和技术的发展，很多诸如此类的政策已经被证明对环境是有害的。但是，基督教还存在另一种对环境友好的传统，Assisi城的&圣芳济&运动就是其中一例，这种传统也许对于从环境角度重新认识基督教是有益的。但是，对于非西方国家环境伦理的发展，基督教将很难能够有所作为，非西方宗教也不大可能成功地在西方产生出某种环境伦理。因此，对于研究宗教的学者们而言，重要的是要走出谁应该为环境危机受到指责的争论，找到世界各主要宗教如何在其各自的文化范围内对发展环境伦理提供最佳帮助的方法。

Part I explains the contents and definition of certification and notarial certification.

第一部分为证明和公证证明的内涵。

Part IV focuses on the division of notarial certification responsibility.

第四部分为我国公证证明的证明责任划分。

After getting hold of a Chinese embassy to notarize a book, you want to arrive your nation in Peking to halt a Chinese embassy to notarize.

1，你出具单身证明(你们国家公证机关或法律机关出示，多出几分)，拿到单身证明后，你到你们国家的中国大使馆去公证。

Ultimately what interests Paharia is proving the model, demonstrating that there's a way to provide education cheaply or even for free to all who are qualified.

证明这种模型才是Paharia感兴趣的事。要证明的是有一种方法可以廉价甚至免费地向所有有资历的学习者提供教育。

They have two good chances and Petr Cech has to say I am here and I am the best.

&对方有两个好机会，而彼得切赫必须证明他驻守在那儿，证明他是最棒的。&

The testified criterion must be different if the testified object or the porty who has presented evidences is different.The system of ...

关于行政诉讼的证明标准，应视证明对象及举证人的不同而不同；目前的法定证据制度是无奈而非理想的选择。

The rule of evidence should be superior in numbers in the rules of evidence which prescribe probative force with the exceptional circumstances.

自由判断原则主要是指法官能够不受事先确立的规则拘束，而自由判断证据的证明力；内心确信原则是指判断证据认定事实应达到内心确信的证明程度。

In fact, as an important theoretical and practical issue, defective documentary evidence affects its probative force and become obstacles to party's testify activity and judge's adjudgement.

实际上，瑕疵书证是一个重要的理论和实践问题，瑕疵的存在使书证的证明力受到影响，成为当事人证明主张和法官查明事实的障碍，不研究其存在现象，就无法认识其一般规律。

The split between the two groups can hardly be papered over.

这两个团体间的分歧难以掩饰。

This approach not only encourages a greater number of responses, but minimizes the likelihood of stale groupthink.

这种做法不仅鼓励了更多的反应，而且减少跟风的可能性。