证明

Any expert witness, witness or property assessor of an insured accident who deliberately provides false supporting documents, thus creating the conditions for another to practise defraudation, shall be deemed an accomplice in insurance fraud and punished as such

保险事故的鉴定人、证明人、财产评估人故意提供虚假的证明文件，为他人诈骗提供条件的，以保险诈骗的共犯论处

The two sorts are:(1) demonstrative reasoning, and (2) probable reasoning.

这两种证明是：（1）证明性推理和（2）可能性推理。

The party who denies facts doesn't need to take the responsibility of burden of proof while the party claiming procedural demurrer needs.

诉讼时效是否已过属客观存在的事实，需要当事人在诉讼过程中予以证明，由当事人承担证明责任。

In chapter 5,we persue the ctiticality and complexity of thecritical sets.We describe carefully the Whitney's example in 1935.Meantime,we introduce some rsults about the critical sets and thecritical value sets,in particular,on W-sets and C-sets.And usingthe Lebesgue density theorem and the Vitali covering lemma weprove a rank zero theorem with Hausdorff measures.Finally wegive some examples to prove our results are sharp in the sense thatthe numbers k,m,n,s,〓,etc.,in the hypothesescan not be improved.

第五章研究临界点集的临界性和复杂性，并详细地描绘了Whit-ney在1935年的例子，同时也介绍了关于临界点集和临界值集的一些结果，尤其是W-集和C-集的一些结果，并利用Lebesgue密度定理和Vitali覆盖引理证明了一个与Hausdorff测度相关的秩零定理，最后举例证明我们的结果在定理的假设中的那些数字如k，m，n，s，a，r+/等不能被改进的情况下是最佳的。

The paper first obtains the L2 -apriori estimates for the solutions of two kinds of autocatalytic model s under Dirichlet boundary conditions, and then, using the properties of linear semigroup and delicate calculations, the estimates of the maximal norms are obtained, therefore, the global existence of the solutions is proved.

该文利用重要不等式及能量积分方法首先得到了解的初等的先验估计。然后利用线性半群的有关性质及精细计算得到了解的最大模估计，从而证明了两类三次自催化模型在Dirichlet边界条件下整体解的存在性，并进而证明了第一类模型的最大吸引子的存在性

Apparently, the approximate controllability doesn"t hold for generally linear parabolic equations with bounded control. It doesn"t hold for the semilinear heat equations presented there,either. Then, it is proved by analyzing its" solutions that no matter how long the time T is , there are targets that can"t be approximated by the solution of heat equation with Dirichlet boundary conditions;If a given target satisying certain conditions can be reached by the solution of heat equation .

本文先针对两个具体的半线性热方程系统证明了控制加约束后系统是不能控的；然后通过分析方程的解，对带位势及Dirichlet边界条件的热方程系统，无论时间多大，都存在不能控的目标；文中还证明了满足一定条件的目标可达。

First, we introduce the concept of polarizable Carnot group and give some new properties of its homogeneous norm. Then we construct a class of non-divergence equations as well as their nontrivial solutions. The failure of corresponding A-B-P type estimate and uniqueness to the Dirichlet problems in space~ follow.

首先引入可极化Carnot群的概念，给出了可极化Carnot群上齐次模的若干性质，然后构造了一类非散度型次椭圆方程及其非平凡解，由此证明此类方程Dirichlet问题的解在函数空间L~中不唯一，进而证明相应的Alexandrov-Bakelman-Pucci型估计不成立。

E Ensure that changes to identity documents will be recognised in all contexts where the identification or disaggregation of persons by gender is required by law or policy

e确保身份证明档的改变在法律或政策需要对人们进行基於性别的证明或分类的所有情况下均得到承认

However, based on my understanding of Jiang Chun-xuan's analysis and the preprint of his new paper "Disproof Of Wiles' Proof For Fermat's Last Theorem", I believe that I am in the position to make some important remarks, which provide strong support to Jiang's disproof of "Wiles's Proof For Fermat's Last Theorem" as follows

然而，基于我对于蒋春暄的分析及其新的文章"对怀尔斯费马大定理证明之否定"预印本的理解，我相信我有条件提出一些重要的看法，可以对蒋春暄否定"怀尔斯费马大定理证明"的文章给予重要支持

We should set the criminal prove standard with "remove rational doubt" in model select of criminal prove standard in our country, and frontal demonstrat in the point of view of recogniyetion, at the sametime, this papeer disproof the rational and feasible "remove rational doubt" from "objective true" in the practice of judicature.

本文在对"客观真实"和"法律真实"的非合理性作了论述之后，提出了作者的观点：在刑事证明标准的模式选择上，应以"排除合理怀疑"为我国的刑事证明标准，并从认识论的角度作了正面的论证，同时，也从"客观真实"在司法实践中的困惑这一角度反证了"排除合理怀疑"的合理性和可行性。

The split between the two groups can hardly be papered over.

这两个团体间的分歧难以掩饰。

This approach not only encourages a greater number of responses, but minimizes the likelihood of stale groupthink.

这种做法不仅鼓励了更多的反应，而且减少跟风的可能性。