枕中的

Bright Star by John Keats Bright star, would I were stedfast as thou art--- Not in lone splendour hung aloft the night And Watching, with eternal lids apart, Like nature's patient, sleepless Eremite, The moving waters at their priestlike task Of pure ablution round earth's human shores, Or gazing on the new soft-fallen mask Of snow upon the mountains and the moors--- No-yet still stedfast, still unchangeable, Pillow'd upon my fair love's ripening breast, To feel for ever in a sweet unrest, Still, still to hear her tender-taken breath, And so live ever---or else swoon to death.

灿亮的星灿亮的星啊，但愿我能如你坚定---但并非孤独地在夜空闪烁高悬，睁着一双永不合拢的眼睛，犹如苦修的隐士彻夜无眠，凝视海水冲洗尘世的崖岸，好似牧师行施净体的沐浴，或正俯瞰下界的荒原与群山被遮盖在轻轻飘落的雪罩里---并非这样---却永远鉴定如故，枕卧在我美丽的爱人的酥胸，永远能感到它的轻轻的起伏，永远清醒，在甜蜜的不安中，永远、永远听着她轻柔的呼吸，永远这样生活---或昏厥而死去。

We have no common name for a mime of Sophron or Xenarchus and a Socratic Conversation; and we should still be without one even if the imitation in the two instances were in trimeters or elegiacs or some other kind of verse--though it is the way with people to tack on 'poet' to the name of a metre, and talk of elegiac-poets and epic-poets, thinking that they call them poets not by reason of the imitative nature of their work, but indiscriminately by reason of the metre they write in.

索夫农 、森那库斯和苏格拉底式的对话采用的模仿没有一个公共的名称；三音步诗、挽歌体或其他类型的诗的模仿也没有——人们把&诗人&这一名词和格律名称结合到一起，称之为挽歌体诗人或者史诗诗人，他们被称为诗人，似乎只是因为遵守格律写作，而非他们作品的模仿本质。

The relationship between communicative competence and grammar teaching should be that of the ends and the means.

交际能力和语法的关系应该是目标与途径的关系。