批判

Point out: The state theory which Marxism founder puts forward and elucidates is mostly the state theory of a kind of criticism, to criticize and reveal the capitalist class country essence , to capture regime road state theory of " revolution " that science prove to proletariat.

指出：马克思主义创始人所提出和阐发的国家学说，更多的是一种批判的国家观，是对资产阶级国家本质的批判和揭露，是对无产阶级夺取政权道路科学说明的&革命&的国家观。

In fact, it can be viewed as the foundation of the first two Critiques.

但实际上，《判断力批判》在现代哲学的视野中，也许有新的维度，也就是说，可以被看作是前两部批判书的基础。

Thorough clarifying the preconditions and demarking the boundaries, the strengthening of rationality which is the foundation of metaphysics can make metaphysics as science possible. The concept of imagination is based on transcendental philosophy in Kantian philosophy.

康德认为所有哲学问题的解决终究要以形而上学问题的解决为基础和开端，所谓&纯粹理性批判&其实是&批判纯粹理性&，通过澄清前提和划清界限来进一步牢固形而上学的根基－理性，从而使形而上学作为科学成为可能。

So Marx criticizes modernity, and this criticism's core is to destruct Subjectivity Metaphysics: On one hand, it destructs Rational Subjectivity Metaphysics on the foundation of human's living world;On the other hand, it destructs the Metaphysics realized in the living world on the base of human's freedom value.

由此，马克思对现代性进行了批判，这种批判是以对主体性形而上学的颠覆为主旨的：一是以人的生活世界的基础颠覆理性主体性形而上学；二是以人的自由价值颠覆现实化于生活世界的形而上学。

Among themthe theoretical basis is analyzed for that the technology is in a dilemma overbeing accepted or being given up as argued in traditional philosophy of technolo gy; the target value refers to human being's liberation and the theoretical coreis the rationalization of democracy; the methodology frame is that used to stud y the technology on the basis of social constructivism and the theme of critiqueis farewell to dystopia.

从理论基础、价值目标、理论内核、方法论框架和批判主题等方面对这一理论展开了剖析，其中理论基础是对传统技术哲学&接受还是放弃&技术的两难困境的分析，价值目标是马克思主义的人的解放，理论内核是民主的理性化，使用的是社会建构论研究技术的方法论框架，批判主题是告别敌托邦。

This theory is discussed in the perspective of its basis, tar get value, theoretical core, methodology frame and theme of critique. Among themthe theoretical basis is analyzed for that the technology is in a dilemma overbeing accepted or being given up as argued in traditional philosophy of technolo gy; the target value refers to human being\'s liberation and the theoretical coreis the rationalization of democracy; the methodology frame is that used to stud y the technology on the basis of social constructivism and the theme of critiqueis farewell to dystopia.

从理论基础、价值目标、理论内核、方法论框架和批判主题等方面对这一理论展开了剖析，其中理论基础是对传统技术哲学&接受还是放弃&技术的两难困境的分析，价值目标是马克思主义的人的解放，理论内核是民主的理性化，使用的是社会建构论研究技术的方法论框架，批判主题是告别敌托邦。

This paper analyses three tendency of network pioneer poem,"Sensual Composition","Breakage" and "Ant- elevation"."Sensual Composition" give a hard shock on current poem which had a aged character, but it also interflows with the utility of commercial society."Breakage" brings a valiant tidal current in poem composition, also forms a wild style."Ant- elevation" lead poem to the ground, hoist the flag of criticizing social problem, but it can also fall poem into trap of politics.

论文重点分析了先锋诗学中出现的&肉身化&、&破坏性&、&崇低&等三大倾向，认为&肉身化&写作对当下诗歌写作中陈腐的&中老年&特征进行了一次重大冲击，但客观上也迎合了&消费社会&的功利性；&破坏性&力量带来了一股强悍的诗歌写作潮流，解构、反讽、审丑、怪诞等写作手法形成了一种粗暴的美学风格，但也引发了诗歌写作新一轮的戏噱和狂欢；&崇低&将诗歌写作再度引向&地面&，重举批判现实的大旗，拆解虚伪的假面，但其借助网络所强调的&政治性批判&和对写作&政治禁区&的突破正让它面临沦为意识形态工具的危险。

Deeply approaching the focuses and difficult points in the research of the Theory of Value,is conducive to correct wrong understandings on Marx's Theory of Labour Value and deepen the research and cognition on the Theory of Labour Value, and is also conducive to propel forward the theoretical innovation and development to Marx's Theory of Labour Value and gain new vitalities into this theory.

究竟该怎样认识和对待马克思的劳动价值论？简括地说：就是一要继承与坚持，二要创新与发展。简单否定劳动价值论，特别是根本没有弄懂和把握马克思的劳动价值理论的真谛和科学内涵，就妄加否定与批判，甚至通过错解和曲解来予以否定和批判，不是一种严肃的科学的治学态度。

I think what shocked me most was that I felt I was being unfairly and harshly judged by vegans, who were no strangers to harsh judgment from family, friends, and society.

我想让我最震惊的是，我竟然收到了素食者的不公平的、严厉的批判，因为他们对于来自于家庭、朋友、社会的严厉的批判并不陌生。

The present paper focuses on the dual aspect of sinology: the interactive process of sinology and Chinese scholars' response to it, i.e., Chinese scholars' critical re-cognition and re-interpretation of China through the perspective of sinologists' research.

本文通过对上述过程的具体展开，对以下主旨进行了论证：西方汉学与中国人对西方汉学的认识与研究，是一个互动过程；中国人通过&汉学家&（包括传教士与早期汉学家）这一中介、对本土对象进行&再认识&，不仅对本土对象取得了新斩获，而且也对&汉学家&的视角和方法有所借鉴与批判；&汉学家&把从中国学者的借鉴与批判中得到的反馈，进一步运用到汉学研究中去。

The split between the two groups can hardly be papered over.

这两个团体间的分歧难以掩饰。

This approach not only encourages a greater number of responses, but minimizes the likelihood of stale groupthink.

这种做法不仅鼓励了更多的反应，而且减少跟风的可能性。