卢克

McLuhan in the 1960s that "the media is not only a passive provision of information channels, but also in the transfer of resources to change the mode of thinking."

麦克卢汉在上世纪60年代指出，"媒体不仅只是被动的提供信息渠道，而是在传输资源的同时改变思考的模式"。

Neither Edison's nor McLuhan's premonitions were realized as they had been projected.

不管是Edison的还是麦克卢汉的设想都没有实现，因为他们都没有正确反映。

From this viewpoint, this paper analyzed the medium theories of McLuhan, and discussed the media relationship between us and the world under the new media environment of network today.

本文正是在这一观照下，对麦克卢汉的媒介思想进行分析，并以此来思考当今以计算机网络为基础的新传媒条件下我们与世界的传媒性关系。

No matter what writer\'s figure or faction or writing mode, It seems to confirm the predict of Mcluhan.

无论是作家的身份、功能还是书写方式，似乎都印证了麦克卢汉的"重新部落化"的预言。

Although McLuhan not experience the Internet revolution, but he has long predicted the changes will bring about profound changes in human beings.

麦克卢汉虽然没有亲历互联网革命，但他早已预见这场变革将给人类带来的深刻变革。

Were McLuhan still among us, today he would have been the first to write something like "Gutenberg strikes back".

如果麦克卢汉还在我们中间，今天他也许会头一个写出"古腾堡反击"这样的东西来。

McLuhan is the founder of Medienphilosophie which has important significance. The focus of his research on medium theories is the essential topic of Medienphilosophie: media relationship between human and the world.

麦克卢汉作为传媒哲学的奠基者其意义是重大的，他的媒介理论研究的焦点归根结底是传媒哲学最根本的问题——人与世界的传媒性关系。

They are Marshall McLuhan a nd Harold A.

一是麦克卢汉，一是伊尼斯。

Media scholar McLuhan had ever said "a truly meaningful and valuable information is not transmission contents of each ear, it is, however, character of communication tool using in that time , the created possibilities and given society revolution."

传播学者麦克卢汉曾说过："真正有意义、有价值的讯息，不是各个时代的传播内容，而是这个时代所使用的传播工具的性质、它所开创的可能性以及带来的社会变革。"

McLuhan explains this process as the creation of a hybrid which blends the old and the new to create a superior medium.

麦克卢汉解释这作为一个混合体，融合了新旧媒体创造一个优越的创作过程。

We have no common name for a mime of Sophron or Xenarchus and a Socratic Conversation; and we should still be without one even if the imitation in the two instances were in trimeters or elegiacs or some other kind of verse--though it is the way with people to tack on 'poet' to the name of a metre, and talk of elegiac-poets and epic-poets, thinking that they call them poets not by reason of the imitative nature of their work, but indiscriminately by reason of the metre they write in.

索夫农 、森那库斯和苏格拉底式的对话采用的模仿没有一个公共的名称；三音步诗、挽歌体或其他类型的诗的模仿也没有——人们把&诗人&这一名词和格律名称结合到一起，称之为挽歌体诗人或者史诗诗人，他们被称为诗人，似乎只是因为遵守格律写作，而非他们作品的模仿本质。

The relationship between communicative competence and grammar teaching should be that of the ends and the means.

交际能力和语法的关系应该是目标与途径的关系。