先父遗传

Both Schopenhauer and Herbert Spencer found telegony to be a creditable theory;[1] it was only conclusively proved wrong with modern understanding of genetics.

叔本华和赫伯特。斯宾塞两人都认为先父遗传是可信的，然而它却被现代基因理论完全驳倒了。

The prevalence of the belief in telegony at the present day is largely due to a case of supposed infection reported to the Royal Society in 1820 by Lord Morton.

先父遗传的广泛流行，在很大程度上源于 1820年Lord Morton报告给the Royal Society的一次疑似"传染"事件。

Still, the belief in telegony persists among some politically marginal groups, such as White supremacists in the Western world, as well as some other racists and/or religious fundamentalists, e. g., in Russia and other ex-USSR countries.

然而，对先父遗传的信奉仍然存在於一些政治边缘团体中，如西方的白人至上主义，以及其他一些，比如存在於俄罗斯和其他前苏联国家中的种族主义和原教旨主义。

The statistician Karl Pearson pointed out that, were telegony true, the later children of the same couple ought increasingly to resemble the father, which he showed was not the case.

统计学家Karl Pearson指出，假如先父遗传属实，一对夫妇的几个孩子中，越小的孩子应该越像父亲，而他发现事实并非如此。

Nevertheless, telegony influenced late nineteenth-century racialist discourse: a woman who had once had a child with a non-Aryan man, it was argued, could never have a "pure" Aryan child again.

然而，先父遗传的理论在19实际晚期曾被种族主义者大肆宣说：如果一个女人有了一个非雅利安人种的孩子，她就永远不可能在生出&纯种&的雅利安孩子来了。

But we don't care about Battlegrounds.

但我们并不在乎沙场中的显露。

Ah! don't mention it, the butcher's shop is a horror.

啊！不用提了。提到肉，真是糟透了。