不公平的

Buildings are the focuses of people's life, the destroy of those will have great influence on people's life. However, if the government interferes in reconstruction deeply, it will transfer the taxation of non-disaster area to disaster area, and so does the relationship between those who don't bear risks and those who bear risks. The result is unfair, so the effective way to protect people's property is to use insurance to bear risks. Although Taiwan has had earthquake insurance since 1972, the number of people who got amende wasn't large. Taiwan repaired the earthquake insurance of buildings, but the price of it was regular, which was unfair. The lack of accurate legitimacy and clearness reveals from this process.

由於住宅是国民生活重心，若是遭受损毁将会对人民生活带来影响，然而政府若是过度介入补救工程，会使国家税收由非灾区转移到灾区、非风险承担者转移到风险承担者身上，造成其间的不公平发展，因此有效保障国民财产安全方法便是采用保险制度来分担风险，虽然我国早在民国61年起便已开办地震保险，但根据资料指出在集集地震灾害中受保障的民众仍不多，民国八十七年前投保地震保险户数实际仅占约国内户数的0.2％，我国在集集地震后重新制订住宅地震保险制度，其保险费用采用单一保费，有违背保险之公平原则，由此可以看出新制地震险在建筑物损害率方面缺乏明确的合理化且透明化的过程。

We should all agree that wherever you draw the line between fair and unfair — which is a very difficult question — the shameless gamesmanship shown by Henry is not acceptable and must not be tolerated.

我们都应该同意给公平和不公平划界限是不容易的，亨利展现的厚颜无耻的比赛哲学是不可接受的，是不可容忍的。

Light holds between its hands The white hill and black oaks, The path that goes o, The tree that stays; Light is a stone that breathes By the sleepwalking river, Light: a girl stretching, A dark bundle dawning; Light shapes the breeze in the curtains, Makes a living body from each hour, Enters the room and slips out, Barefoot, on the edge of a knife; Light is born a woman in a mirror, Naked under diaphanous leaves, Chained by a look, Dissolved in a wink; It touches the fruit and the unbodied, It is a pitcher from which the eye drinks clarities, A flame cut in blossom, a candle watching Where the blackwinged butterfly burns; Light opens the folds of the sheets And the creases of puberty, Glows in the fireplace, its flame becomes shadows That climb the walls, yearning ivy; Light does not absolve or condemn, Is neither just or unjust, Light with impalpable hands raises The buildings of symmetry; Light escapes through a passage of mirrors And returns to light: Is a hand that invents itself, An eye that sees itself in its own inventions.

光 双手拥着白色山峦与黑色橡树林，前行的路，停留的树；光是梦游的河旁呼吸的石光：一个女孩舒展，一束暗色破晓。光勾勒出帘中微风的形状，每时每刻造出一个鲜活的身体，光著脚，踩著刀刃；蹑入房间，又溜走；光是镜中诞生的女人，裸露在透明的叶底，被目光锁定，瞬间消逝；它触摸著果实和无形，眼睛在它的水罐饮著清晰，火焰绽放如花，蜡烛目睹黑翅的蝴蝶燃烧光展开被单的折皱与青春期的皱痕在壁炉里光芒焕发，它的火焰成影在墙上攀爬，怀恋著长春藤光既不赦免也不谴责无公平与不公平而言光，用无法察觉的双手举起对称的建筑；光在镜子的通道里逃遁返回于光：一只发明自己的手，一只在自己的发明中看到自己的眼。

People who feel inequitably treated and dissatisfied are motivated to do something to restore equity.

那些觉得受到不公平对待和不满的人，会作一些事去恢复公平。

I back them 100%, because it should either Justice or unjustice for all, but that never the cases in Italy.

译者注。我100%支持，因为这关系到要么就全都公平对待，要么就全不公平，虽然类似的案例在意大利从没发生过。

Starting from the right of equality, Rawls animadverts utilitarianism and substitutes it for "two principles as fairness and justice" in which rational people choose under the "original position", and thinks everyone should be equal and people should distribute wealth according to "the principle of justice as fairness", unless you have the enough reasons that can justify everyone should be unequal. He understands the distributive object as a series of public resources and systems of liberty, including the positions and offices, opportunity, natural endowment, honor, safety, freedom of life and action, freedom of thought and conscience. The aims of distributive principle of justice are to realize rational distribution of these public resources in a cooperative and well-ordered society. Starting from inalienable rights of man, Nozick thinks that everyone should be unequal, unless you have sufficient reasons that can justify everyone should be equal and without the consent of the individual, others can not infringe upon his property and rights with any excuses. He advances the justice of "holding" with a theory of qualification and entitlement, and maintains individual economic and free rights and the right of property.

罗尔斯从平等的权利出发，通过&原初状态&下的理性人自主选择&公平正义的两个原则&来取代功利主义，认为除非有充足理由证明应当不平等，否则就应当平等，并根据公平的正义原则分配公共资源和自由体系，包括职务、机会、天赋、荣誉、安全、人生行动自由、思想自由和良心自由等，&分配的正义观&就是要实现这些公共资源在一个合作且秩序良好的自由体系里的合理分配；诺齐克从人的不可剥夺的权利出发，认为除非你有充足理由证明应当平等，否则就应当不平等，没有个体的同意，任何人也不能以任何借口侵犯他的财产和权利，通过&资格&理论确立&持有&的正当性，维护个人的经济自由权利和财产权利。

The authors of this paper pointed out the followings: there is no intrinsic certain relation between these two issues; we should neither discuss the hazards of using stimulants to physical and mental health and the harm of competitive sports to the body, psychology and morality of the athletes at the same level, nor con-sider that the hazards brought by using stimulants to the healthy development of sports are as equally bad as the phenomenon of unfairness existing in the development of competitive sports and the phenomenon of science and technology "dissimilating" competitive sports; the fundamental goal of prohibiting the use of stimulants is to main-tain the spirit of fair competition of competitive sports.

研究指出，两者之间没有什么内在的必然联系；不能将使用兴奋剂对身心健康的危害与竞技体育对运动员身体、心理、道德等方面的伤害放在同一层面讨论，也不能将使用兴奋剂给体育健康发展带来的危害与竞技体育发展中存在的不公平现象、科技使竞技体育的&异化&现象相提并论；禁止使用兴奋剂的根本目的是维护竞技体育的公平竞争精神。

via their study the authors considered that it is lacking in logical reasoning for the authors of the paper titled on the return of competitive sports to their game playing nature - thoughts inspired by stimulant prohibition to further draw such a conclusion as the nature of competitive sports being game playing from their analysis of the hazards of using stimulants.the authors of this paper pointed out the followings: there is no intrinsic certain relation between these two issues; we should neither discuss the hazards of using stimulants to physical and mental health and the harm of competitive sports to the body, psychology and morality of the athletes at the same level, nor consider that the hazards brought by using stimulants to the healthy development of sports are as equally bad as the phenomenon of unfairness existing in the development of competitive sports and the phenomenon of science and technology "dissimilating" competitive sports; the fundamental goal of prohibiting the use of stimulants is to maintain the spirit of fair competition of competitive sports.

兴奋剂事件有隐情？摘要：研究认为《论竞技体育的游戏本原回归——由禁用兴奋剂引发的思考》由分析使用兴奋剂的危害入手，进而提出&竞技体育的本原是游戏&这一论断缺乏逻辑推理。研究指出，两者之间没有什么内在的必然联系；不能将使用兴奋剂对身心健康的危害与竞技体育对运动员身体、心理、道德等方面的伤害放在同一层面讨论，也不能将使用兴奋剂给体育健康发展带来的危害与竞技体育发展中存在的不公平现象、科技使竞技体育的&异化&现象相提并论；禁止使用兴奋剂的根本目的是维护竞技体育的公平竞争精神。

via their study the authors considered that it is lacking in logical reasoning for the authors of the paper titled on the return of competitive sports to their game playing nature - thoughts inspired by stimulant prohibition to further draw such a conclusion as the nature of competitive sports being game playing from their analysis of the hazards of using stimulants.the authors of this paper pointed out the followings: there is no intrinsic certain relation between these two issues; we should neither discuss the hazards of using stimulants to physical and mental health and the harm of competitive sports to the body, psychology and morality of the athletes at the same level, nor consider that the hazards brought by using stimulants to the healthy development of sports are as equally bad as the phenomenon of unfairness existing in the development of competitive sports and the phenomenon of science and technology "dissimilating" competitive sports; the fundamental goal of prohibiting the use of stimulants is to maintain the spirit of fair competition of competitive sports.

研究认为《论竞技体育的游戏本原回归——由禁用兴奋剂引发的思考》由分析使用兴奋剂的危害入手，进而提出&竞技体育的本原是游戏&这一论断缺乏逻辑推理。研究指出，两者之间没有什么内在的必然联系；不能将使用兴奋剂对身心健康的危害与竞技体育对运动员身体、心理、道德等方面的伤害放在同一层面讨论，也不能将使用兴奋剂给体育健康发展带来的危害与竞技体育发展中存在的不公平现象、科技使竞技体育的&异化&现象相提并论；禁止使用兴奋剂的根本目的是维护竞技体育的公平竞争精神。

Not all automakers will be treated as equals in order to avoid unfairly penalizing some automakers more than others. Depending upon the types of vehicles they produce, the plan sets different goals.

不是所有的汽车制造商会被公平对待，为了避免对某些汽车制造商的不公平处罚，根据他们生产的不同交通工具类型设定了不同的目标值。

She gently rebuff ed him, but agreed that they could be friends

她婉言拒绝了，但同意作为朋友相处。

If in the penal farm, you were sure to be criticized.

要是在劳改农场，你等着挨绳子吧！