查询词典 sensa

He mentions another transcendental argument that is also supposed to establish something called 'universals' as things different from 'sensa'.9 Again, the particular argument is found questionable, but it is said to be transcendental in attempting to prove something by showing that it is required as a solution to a problem: in this case, how is it possible for science to make true statements about reality, given that they are not statements about 'sensa'?

还提到另一类先验论证，特被用来建立区别于感官物的普遍物：在&对科学试图做出关于实在事物的真陈述来说如何是可能的，假设它们不是关于感官物的陈述的话？&上试图指出所必要的东西。

It contains the conditional premiss that if there were not things other than sensa we would not be able to name things, and adds to it the factual premiss that we do or are able to name things, perhaps even that we 'justifiably' do.

它是一个条件性前提，即如果感觉之外别无他物，我们将不能做我们现在能做的事情，又隐含一个事实前提，即我们已经进行或可以进行命名，至少我们"经过辩护地"可以做。

From those two premisses it follows that there are things other than sensa.

通过这两个前提，得出结论：有感觉之外的物存在。

It is assumed further that we call many of these different 'sensa' by the same single name, for example, 'This is grey', 'That is grey', and so on.

我们假设我们在不同的情形下&感觉&到了杂多而不同的东西，我们进一步假设我们用了同一个单名来称呼这些不同的&感觉材料&，比如&这是灰的&&那是灰的&等。

So is it even true that in applying the word "grey" to our different sensa we are naming something?

所以我们每次用&灰&来描述我们不同的感觉时我们就是在命名么？

Austin says this is a 'transcendental argument', and 'in Kant's sense':4 'if there were not in existence something other than sensa, we should not be able to do what we are able to do (viz., name things).

Austin说这是一个先验论证，在康德的意义上的：如果这里除了感官物没有其他东西存在，我们就不能做我们做的事情。

Austin says this is a 'transcendental argument', and 'in Kant's sense':4 'if there were not in existence something other than sensa, we should not be able to do what we are able to do (viz., name things).

奥斯汀说，这是康德意义上的&先验论证&：&如果感觉之外别无他物，我们将不能做我们现在能做的事情，即命名。&

I have my sensa ...

嗯，呢个时候我谂。。。

It is assumed further that we call many of these different 'sensa' by the same single name, for example, 'This is grey', 'That is grey', and so on. And it is assumed finally that this practice is in some sense "justifiable" or indispensable.

例如，&这是灰色&、&那是灰色&，等，这最终假设的是这个实践过程在某种意义上是合理的或不可或缺的。

It contains the conditional premiss that if there were not things other than sensa we would not be able to name things, and adds to it the factual premiss that we do or are able to name things, perhaps even that we 'justifiably' do.

它是一个条件性前提，即如果感觉之外别无他物，我们将不能做我们现在能做的事情，又隐含一个事实前提，即我们已经进行或可以进行命名，至少我们&经过辩护地&可以做。

A solid basis of evidence underpinned her theory.

有利的证据基础支持她的理论。

Apoptosis was detected in both of the cell lines in the absence of folacin, but no necrosis was observed in this experiment.

实验组和对照组中，均未观察到细胞坏死，每种细胞均可看到凋亡细胞；HBL-100在实验组的P53突变型蛋白面积比对照组大（P.05），实验组P53mRNA阳性面积比对照组的大（P.05）。