查询词典 logic

The concept of relative Γ-tautology degree of formulas in four important propositional logics, Lukasiewicz logic, L(superscript *) logic, Gdel logic and product logic, has been proposed, and basic properties of it are obtained.

基于广义重言式理论，在四种重要的命题逻辑系统Lukasiewicz系统，L系统，Gdel系统和Ⅱ系统中，引入了公式的相对Γ-重言度概念，给出了相对Γ-重言度的若干性质。

R.Carnap's meaning theory is a milestone of history of logic. It has great influences on many branches of logic such as modal logic and Montagu's intension logic.

卡尔纳普的意义理论是逻辑学发展史上的一个重要的环节，对逻辑学的许多分支如模态逻辑、蒙塔古内涵逻辑等发生过重大影响。

Logic such as knowledge logic, belief 1ogi, and so on, can be regarded as a "positive" logic, and doubting logic as a "negative" one.

如果说知道逻辑、信念逻辑都是"正"的逻辑的话，那麽怀疑逻辑则是"负"的逻辑。

It is also used to generate SPICE stimulus waveforms for these special sequential logic circuits quickly according to user's logic parameter specifications, as can speed up the logic parameter extraction process and guarantee a proper SPICE simulation waveform for the logic extraction.

提出了对具有反馈信息的时序逻辑电路进行逻辑参数提取时用于SPICE模拟的激励波形自动生成方法，该方法能根据用户指定的要提取的时延参数要求，很快产生这种时序逻辑电路的模拟激励波形，从而可以加快逻辑参数的提取过程，保证参数提取激励波形的正确性。

In this part, the paper inspects and studies Lukasiewicz"s 3-valued logic, the truth function of 3-valued logic, the study of axiomatized system of Lukasiewicz"s 3-valued logic and the many-valued generalizations of Lukasiewiczs 3-valued logic, etc.

在这一部分中，文章考察的内容主要有卢卡西维茨的三值逻辑理论、三值逻辑的真值函项、卢卡西维茨的三值逻辑的公理化研究和卢卡西维茨的三值逻辑的推广等。

Based on the field work among the Azande and the analysis of ancient Chinese logic and the logic of Buddhism, this paper attempts to provide factual information for the argument for the "culture-based relativity of logic" in a descriptive way. Taking the deductive method as the classical research method, this paper argues for the existence of the culture-based relativity of logic in modern culture and other cultures. The validity of this argument is based on the findings of ethnographic as well as historical studies. This paper also seeks to prove by studying the interactions between different languages and ways of life that the classical research method was also built on cultural relativity.

对阿赞得人的田野考察报告，以及中国古代逻辑和佛教逻辑的研究成果，从描述的角度为&逻辑相对于文化&这一命题提供事实根据；采用演绎论证作为元方法说明现代文化中的逻辑和其他文化的逻辑在现代文化中的译本具有文化相对性；借助民族志和历史学研究成果说明其他文化的逻辑本身也具有的文化相对性；通过语言博弈和生活形式概念说明作为元方法的演绎论证同样具有文化相对性。

This is a criticism of the main point and the way of argument in Concept of Logic by Wang Lu. Wang's main point (the only object of logic is necessary inference and the nature of logic is necessity) failed completely to meet with the historical facts of the brith and development of the science of logic.

本文是对王路《逻辑的观念》一书基本观点(逻辑的对象仅仅是必然性推理，逻辑的内在机制是必然地得出)及其论证手法的批评：该书的基本观点完全不符合古今中外逻辑科学产生和发展的历史事实，其论证手法是&偷换和歪曲&。

Comparing withHayek's theory on society method, I believe constitution litigationmechanism must considering the following conclusion in modelingconstitutional method: first, the acquiring of constitutional method isusually effects system vicissitudes. Although constitutional arbitramentcan form definite constitutional method, it can't achieve perduringsubstantial results level of method; secondly, constitutional method isformed virtually by the mixture of two kind of potence, and one is socialpotence, the other is governmental potence. The constitutional method'srationality in logic structure rests directly with the wrestling process ofconstitutional logic and social process. Constitutional method is more akind of simulative conformation of natural logic and social logic, itforms by the wrestling of government, public, legislature andconstitution judging organ. Fourthly, the maintenance of constitutionalmethod depends on the inner power sustained by faith and exteriorpower coming from the background of compulsion. Fifthly,constitutional method itself is a dynamic structure, and it's realizingquomodo and vindicating means is being in vicissitude, however, it canonly provide condition and inspiritment.

对照哈耶克的社会秩序理论，笔者认为，宪法诉讼机制在型构宪政秩序时必然要照顾到以下结论：其一，宪政秩序的取得，往往是一个制度自然变迁的结果，宪法裁决虽然也可能在短期内形成一定的宪法秩序，不过却无法强行地达到一个较大范围内持久的秩序实效水准；其二，宪政秩序实际上是由两种力量交合而成的，一是社会力量，一是政府力量，宪政秩序的逻辑结构的合理性直接取决于宪法逻辑和社会逻辑之间的博弈过程；其三，宪政秩序更多的是一种对自然逻辑和社会逻辑的模拟形态，是经由政府、公众、立法机关与宪法裁判机构的合作博弈而形成的，宪法诉讼的功用至多在于提供博弈规则，以实现纳什均衡；其四，宪政秩序的维护主要依靠来自信念支持的内部力量与来自强制背景的外部力量；其五，宪政秩序本身是一个动态的、常新的结构，其实现方式与维护手段也处于不断变迁之中，但无论如何，宪法诉讼机制所能提供的只是制约与激励两种。

He made a comparative analysis on Chinese nominalistic logic with Western Aristotles logic and Indian classical logic, and revealed the main content of logic of Moism, including basic concept, principle of inference, induction ect.

本文拟从以下几个方面对梁启超的逻辑——方法论思想进行分析评述： 1、梁启超取得逻辑——方法论研究成就的历史条件：①清代诸子学的考证训诂成果使《墨子》一书稍可读通；②西学输入促进了梁启超对中国古典逻辑的研究；③研究墨学和科学的逻辑方法，为宣传维新变法思想提供方法论武器；④梁启超对墨子及墨家学说的主观偏爱。

They are: the achievements of textual research and exegesis of Zhu Zi Xue in Qing Dynasty; the promoting effect of the introducing Western theories that took on the research of Chinese classical logic; taking the doctrine of Moism and scientific logic method as a methodological weapon for propagating reformist thought and Liang Qichao"s favor to Mo Zi and theory of Moism.The second part is about Liang Qichao"s achievements of logic and methodology: he analyzed induction and deduction, and thoroughly analyzed induction in particular, and his thought about those was mainly correct; he analyzed comparison as a component of induction and discussed the cognitive function of comparison, he also explained how to use comparison in the research of history; he not only explicated the thinking process of analytical method and synthetic method, but also integrated the two methods with studying history and reading history , and turned them into specific research methods of history ;he expound the rule of causal law , just as Leibnizs principle of sufficient reason in Western modern times and the law of sufficient reasonin universal logic; he discussed nominal classification, and analyzed wrong classification of the forefathers, then he pointed out the significance of clarifying the basic of division .

不足在于：①梁启超对于各种科学方法的论述不够系统、全面；②梁启超比较研究方法仍存在一些缺陷，他的比较研究主要是将墨家论式与西方逻辑的三段论(有的与印度因明的三支作法)形式作求同研究，缺乏系统性和全面性，而且对三种逻辑的共同点和差异点的分析也缺乏理论深度，加之梁启超不懂得数理逻辑，缺乏精确的数理逻辑工具，因而使这种对比分析缺乏严密性和精确性。

Now she was hungry and angry.She began to smoulder.

现在她又饿又气，她开始流露难以抑制的怒火。

You have placed our iniquities before You, Our secret sins in the light of Your presence.

诗90：8 你将我们的罪孽摆在你面前、将我们的隐恶摆在你面光之中。