查询词典 Jane Doe

Chapter 5 will start with Americas case Feist v. Jane Doe to understand the case s influence to American legal protection of databases and introduce the Parliament s proposal after the EU Directive.

第五章延续第三章、第四章论述后，进入美国1991年Feist案后，美国法院对国内资料库保护之后续见解，探究1991年Feist案对美国资料库保护之影响程度，同时并述美国於欧体公布资料库指令后国会提出之资料库立法草案。

Chapter 1 is a preface to introduce the motives of this paper research methods scope restriction and frame Chapter 2 will fist introduce the concept of database and then discuss the necessity of database protection in the creating methods and with or without originality This chapter will put emphasis on the importance of originality to database Chapter 3 will observe the British America and Germany's viewpoint of originality to discuss their legislative mode of database legal protection Chapter will introduce EU Directive/96/9/EC of database protection and four judges of EU Court after the Directive takes effect in 2004 to find how the ECJ use the Directive Then according to the DG Internal Market and Service Working Pater and BEUC's evaluation of the Directive this paper will find whether there is positive reaction and influence in database market after EU member countries take the same legislations with the Directive Section 5 will introduce the legislation of British and Germany following the Directive and analyze the development and questions of the two countries' current legislation Chapter 5 will start with Americas case Feist v Jane Doe to understand the case's influence to American legal protection of databases and introduce the Parliament's proposal after the EU Directive Chapter 6 will introduce Japan legislation regarding legal protection of database works and discuss the goodness and badness through Japan academy and judicial viewpoint Chapter 7 will introduce Taiwan's legislation to find whether current law provides enough and adequate protection to databases and discuss whether there is a necessity of amendment At last this paper will try to provide some suggestions about our legislation Chapter 8 is the conclusion of this paper

第二章首先介绍资料库之概念，并以建置方式与是否具原创性区分方式探讨资料库法律保护之必要性，而因著眼原创性对於资料库法律保护之重要性，便於第三章以比较法独立观察英、美、德国对原创性之观点，以接续探讨三国对资料库所采取之立法途径。第四章部份介绍欧盟资料库保护指令之相关规定，并就指令公布后，欧盟法院於2004年接续作出四个关於资料库保护之判决加以介绍，以期寻求欧盟法院如何运用指令规范中之构成要件，而后并参考欧盟委员会工作小组及消费者组织报告对欧体资料库指令之评估文献，探究欧盟各国采取与指令相同立法后，在资料库市场上是否有正面的回应及影响，并於第五节针对英、德两国跟进欧盟资料库保护指令立法之介绍，并归纳、检讨英、德两国之现行法制之发展与所面临之问题。第五章延续第三章、第四章论述后，进入美国1991年Feist案后，美国法院对国内资料库保护之后续见解，探究1991年Feist案对美国资料库保护之影响程度，同时并述美国於欧体公布资料库指令后国会提出之资料库立法草案。第六章则针对日本新增资料库著作之立法模式加以介绍，并藉由日本学界、实务之见解探讨该立法模式之优缺点，再於第七章进入我国法制之介绍，以观察我国目前之法制是否提供资料库充分的保护，探讨资料库立法之必要性，最后尝试提出我国立法模式之建议。第八章则为总结之论述。

We have some questions about that Jane Doe we showed you in the morgue.

我们想问你一些问题，和上次在停尸房给你看的无名女尸有关。

With the same casings as our Jane Doe's?

和我们这位无名氏被枪击的子弹是一样的？

In similar fashion, a female is referred to as Jane Doe.

类似的，如果是女尸或者女病人，就叫她简。

If it's a female, we'll call her Jane Doe, they laughed.

他们笑着说，它要是母的，就叫它简。

M.D.N.C. 2003). Having failed to respond to the Motion to Dismiss, the Plaintiff has not shown that service of process was effected on "Jane Doe" in this case.

原告没有对驳回申请作出答复，他没有证明本案中程序送达对Jane Doe是有效的。

More than a year has passed since the Plaintiff filed this action, and the Plaintiff has failed to serve the Defendant "Jane Doe" as required by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

自从原告提起本诉讼起，已经过了一年多了，原告并没有按照联邦民事诉讼规则规则4的要求对被告Jane Doe实施送达。

To date, US Airways Group, Inc. has not been served with a summons and Complaint, nor has the Defendant "Jane Doe" been identified or served with a summons and Complaint.

直到现在，合众国航空集团公司也没有收到传票和起诉，被告Jane Doe没有被指定，也没有收到传票和起诉。

The name "Jane Doe," a logical female equivalent, is used in many state jurisdictions, but if the case is federal, the unnamed defendant is dubbed "Mary Major."

Jane Doe呢，也就是女张三这个名字在美国州法律中用的很多。

The split between the two groups can hardly be papered over.

这两个团体间的分歧难以掩饰。

This approach not only encourages a greater number of responses, but minimizes the likelihood of stale groupthink.

这种做法不仅鼓励了更多的反应，而且减少跟风的可能性。