怀疑论

基本解释 (translations)

scepticism  ·  skepticism

与怀疑论相关的网络例句 [注：此内容来源于网络，仅供参考]

But individual human beings have purposes, and there is nothing in agnosticism to cause them to abandon these purposes.

但是对于个体的人生会有目的，而怀疑论没有任何理由要他们抛弃这些目的。

The worry here is that there is always going to be something intellectually unsatisfactory about an antiskeptical proposal that is run along epistemologically externalist lines.18

18下面我们会在怀疑论争论中更为细节地考察认识论外在论和内在论的角色，因为它提出了一些议题，影响了所有的反怀疑论策略，无论是否支持闭合原则。

In general, although the point is not always put in these terms, the complaint is that these recent anti-skeptical approaches offer us, at best, an epistemologically externalist response to skepticism when what we wanted was one that functioned within an epistemologically internalist framework.

一般来说（尽管这个关键点通常不是这样提出的），对这些最近的反怀疑论进路的抱怨是，这些至多是对怀疑论的认识上的外在论回应『 epistemologically externalist response 』，而我们所需要的是要在认识上的内在论框架『 epistemologically internalist framework 』内起作用的回应。

Despite the current popularity of externalist accounts of knowledge, however, one might be less sanguine about the prospects for an externalist response to the problem of radical skepticism. The reason for this is that the skeptical puzzle seems to itself strike against the prima facie attraction of an externalist account of knowledge.

尽管当前流行对知道的外在论说明，一个人依然可以对'通过外在论回应彻底怀疑论'不报希望，这是因为怀疑论难题似乎本身就反击的是对知道的外在论说明。

Provided that one is willing to make the plausible move of construing "eliminate" here in terms of the ability to know the negation of, then one straightforwardly gets the requisite link between infallibilism and (S2) since the skeptical hypothesis in question (whichever skeptical hypothesis it is) will clearly be an error possibility which must be known to be false if the agent is to have knowledge of the ordinary proposition at issue.

假如有人愿意根据'知道否定__'的能力来解释这里的"排除"，那么他就直接在（S2）和不可错论的必要连接，因为怀疑论假说（无论是哪一个怀疑论假说）显然是一个错误可能性（——如果一个人要对相应常识命题有知道，就必须知道其为假）。

The conclusion such arguments hope to draw is not a refutation of some variety of epistemic skepticism via a demonstration of the alternative, but rather a demonstration of the unintelligibility of the skeptical position.

这样的论证所希望获得的，不是通过对其他选项的证明来实现对怀疑论的拒绝，而是证明怀疑论立场的unintelligibility。

In so doing, we will be setting aside concerns discussed by Anthony Brueckner (1994b) and Stewart Cohen (1998c) that skeptical arguments might instead rest upon a different epistemic principle entirely, what they term an "underdetermination" principle.2 Relatedly, we will also be taking a very modern Cartesian understanding of the skeptical argument for granted, and therefore ignoring the emergence of renewed interest in classical Pyrrhonian skeptical arguments by such figures as Williams (1988b) and Robert Fogelin (1994).3 Finally, attention will be confined to those anti-skeptical theories of knowledge which are genuinely capable (given, of course, that they are correct) of meeting the skeptical challenge.

在这样做的时候，我们会把有些有关系的讨论放到一边，例如Anthony Brueckner (1994b)和 Stewart Cohen (1998c)所指出的怀疑论论证可以依赖于不同的认识论原则，他们称为&不确定性原则『&underdetermination& principle』&。[2]相关的，我们也会承认对怀疑论论证的笛卡尔式理解，因此忽略了出现的对古典Pyrrhonian怀疑论论证的重新关注，例如Williams (1988b)和 Robert Fogelin (1994)。[3]最后，也不会去关注这样的反怀疑论理论，这些真正能够和怀疑论挑战交锋。

Christopher Hookway sympathetically describes the impact of MTAs on skepticism as giving us permission to "resist" skeptical doubts by showing we need not take their challenge seriously. 40 This result, he claims, legitimates existing confidence by preventing doubt from arising.

Hookway同情地表达MTAs对怀疑论的影响：允许我们通过指明我们无需认真对待怀疑论的挑战而'抵抗怀疑论的怀疑'。40 这个结果使得通过'阻止怀疑的提出'而'有信心'是legitimate的。

Although Wright does succeed in at least showing how the diagnosis of radical skepticism that the hinge proposition line offers might lead to a refutation of the skeptical argument, a number of problems with his approach remain.

尽管Wright成功指出彻底怀疑论的转轴命题诊断是如何可能提供一个对怀疑论论证的拒绝的，但这个进路还有些问题留了下来。

So either our knowledge ascriptions in everyday contexts are right, in which case we shouldn't take skepticism so seriously in conversational contexts in which skepticism is at issue; or else the skeptic is right, and thus our everyday practice of ascribing knowledge is under threat.

所以，或者我们的知识归属，在日常语境是对的，在这情况下我们不应该（在讨论怀疑论的会话语境中）把怀疑论视为严肃的。或者，怀疑论是对的，于是我们的归属知识的日常实践受到威胁。

与怀疑论相关的网络解释 [注：此内容来源于网络，仅供参考]

nihilism：虚无主义,极端怀疑论

nanotechnology 纳米技术 | nihilism 虚无主义,极端怀疑论 | nomenclature (某一学科的)术语, 专门名称

Pyrrhonist：绝对怀疑论者,怀疑论信徒

saxophonist 吹萨克斯的人 | Pyrrhonist 绝对怀疑论者,怀疑论信徒 | 235.coercionist 高压政治论者,强制主义者

restricted：限制性

本文将回顾这场由布鲁克勒发动的仔细检查怀疑论论证的逻辑结构的运动,并为这样一种观点提供辩护:在逻辑上不充分决定性原理与演绎闭合原理互不蕴涵;同时,我们应该区分两种类型的怀疑论论证--整体(global)怀疑论假设论证和限制性(restricted)怀疑论假设论证.

sceptically：怀疑性地

sceptical /怀疑论的/怀疑的/ | sceptically /怀疑性地/ | scepticism /怀疑论/怀疑主义/

scepticism：怀疑论

)然而,20世纪的文学批评在繁荣的表象之下却是一个怀疑论(Scepticism)缺席的时代,这直接地影响了文学批评的思想厚度和削弱其批判的锋芒. 与此相关,20世纪中国的文学批评,往往是充当思想鹦鹉和知识看守的模仿式批评,

scepticism：怀疑论主义

getting on my nerves 表示某人被惹怒了的短评语 | scepticism:怀疑论主义 | recoup:补偿,赔偿

skeptically：怀疑性地

skeptical /怀疑性的/怀疑论的/多疑的/多疑/ | skeptically /怀疑性地/ | skepticism /怀疑论/

skepticism：怀疑论

什么是"怀疑论"(Skepticism)?这些问题一股脑儿地问过来. 我说,大约在基督教产生之前几百年,西方从古希腊的柏拉图(Plato)起,就开始把我们的"观念"或"理念"(idea)看成是比我们面对的世界或实在(reality)更为根本的东西,

antiskeptical：反怀疑论

antisensibilisin 抗致敏素 | antiskeptical 反怀疑论 | antisocial aggression 反社会性攻击

Pyrrhonic：怀疑论

Pyrrho 皮洛 | Pyrrhonic 怀疑论 | Pyrrhonist 绝对怀疑论者