right in personam

right in personam的基本解释

-

[经] 债权, 对人权

与right in personam相关的网络例句 [注：此内容来源于网络，仅供参考]

Abstract］The reason why trust property right in common law system is incompatible with the system of right in rem in civil law lies in the two characteristics of such right rooted in British history since the 11th century: firstly, the English trust property right is based on the concept of estate and, therefore, has the characteristic of the estate, which means it is possible to have more than one right in one thing; and secondly, trust property right in common law system is created on the basis of agreement and therefore is inseparable from the right in personam.

内容提要：英美信托财产权之所以难以融入大陆法物权体系，根源于11世纪末以来英国历史所赋予它的两大特性：第一，英美信托财产权以地产权为基础，具有地产权的特性，可以一物多权；第二，英美信托财产权的创设基于合意，具有与\&债权\&密不可分的交叉特性。李培锋，中南财经政法大学法学院副教授。

Chapter six brings forward the author's opinion on the possible theoretical obstacles of the transplantation of the conditional sales system of German law into the Chinese legal environment The principle of independence of right in rem and the principle of the abstract right in rem are normally not acknowledged by the Chinese legal academia, from which it may be deducted that the remainder is a right in personam, and therefore constitutes the obstacle of the transplantation.

第六章对我国借鉴德国所有权保留制度可能面临的理论障碍进行创新分析，提出独立见解。我国学界通说不承认物权独立性以及无因性原则，从这一逻辑出发可以推论出期待权应为债权性质，从而为借鉴德国所有权保留制度设置了障碍。

Through the development in five processes,the budding process,the distinction of jUS in re and ius in personam,the distinction of right in re and right in personam according to their objects,the distinction of fight in re and obligaional right according to their scopes of effectiveness,and the critically development process, the structure of property law of Continental Legal System has takes on a changeless dual system with the right in re and obligaional right.

大陆法系财产法先后经历了萌芽、对物权与对人权分野、依对象标准划分物权债权、依效力标准划分物权债权和批判发展五个阶段，形成了相对凝固的物债二元结构。

与right in personam相关的网络解释 [注：此内容来源于网络，仅供参考]

right in rem：对物权

八、对物权(right in rem)和对人权(right in personam)以及所有权(ownership)对物(in rem)"和"对人(in personam)"这两个词在当时的司法推理中的使用一直十分混乱,其主要的用法如:对物权(right in rem)和对人权(in personam)、对物的

right in rem：物权

按照传统解释,以物权(right in rem)是指对一般人的权利,或称对世权,如财产所有权. 对人权(right in personam或personal right)则指对特定人的权利,如因合同而生的权利. 但霍菲尔德认为,对物权不应被看作是对物的权利,

right in personam：对人权

18他们也没有像霍菲尔德那样用这些基本概念对一些常用的法律概念进行分析. 而霍菲尔德在分析对物权和对人权以及所有权等实际问题时,却将这些基本概念运用得游刃有余. (十)对物权(right in rem)和对人权(right in personam)以及所有权(ownership)