oncoming force

oncoming force的基本解释

-

来势

与oncoming force相关的网络例句 [注：此内容来源于网络，仅供参考]

Because of inappropriate operation between oncoming straight and left-turn vehicles of signalized intersections of urban areas in Taiwan the department of traffic ever offered corrigible opinions involve in right of way, center of intersections adjudging hard and indirectly encouraged to accelerate left-turn vehicles. But all still lack quantification analysis. Therefore, this problem is worth studying.This study will aim at safe passage of oncoming straight and left-turn vehicles for at-grade signalized intersections. So, this study will be based on row's theory, theory of traffic conflicts, and take many factors into consideration, such as the width of the intersections, types of the intersections, center of the intersections, the size of the vehicles, the location of the vehicles, the radius of turn, paths of operation, the speed of the vehicles, the types of collisions, the angle of road, and also deduce formulas of coordinate of paths. The main method used in this research is the simulation of different situations. By the method, the analytic model of safe passage of oncoming straight and left-turn vehicles for at-grade signalized intersections will be established, and this study will also subsume critical speed of conflict and expected number of times of safe passage. Finally involved rules of safe passage will be proffered.

鉴於台湾都市地区路口对向直行左转车辆常遭受对向车辆不当驾驶行为干扰，因而道路交通主管机关曾针对路口对向直行左转相关道路交通法规可能产生之对向直行左转路权判断不易、路口中心处不易区分、间接鼓励路口转弯车加速左转等问题提出检讨之修正意见，唯整体考量仍缺少〝量化〞分析，系一值得研究之课题，因此，本研究将针对号志化平面路口对向直行左转车辆安全通行问题於法规层面上之特殊性，以交通冲突理论、路权理论为基础，并考量路口宽度、路口型式、路口中心处、车辆尺寸、转弯半径、运行轨迹、行驶速率、行车位置、最终碰撞型态、道路交角等因素，先行推导车辆行驶轨迹座标公式，再利用情境模拟分析法，进行号志化平面路口对向直行左转车辆安全通行分析，分析过程中则纳入冲突临界速率与安全通行期望次数理念，并根据路口对向左转车辆安全通行轨迹、速率集中分布范围之分析结果及相关理论，研拟号志化路口对向左转车辆安全通行轨迹、速率，及对向直行左转车辆路权判断原则，以供驾驶者路口直行左转安全通行之参考。

So say American film society to sue fast thunder can additional purposeful, these year western country always censures China in intellectual property domain, because,force of fire of before a few years of Zhuhai is sued by SIGMATEL of provider of American MP3 chip also is intellectual property, the swift and violent development that real reason is Zhuhai fire force truly has browbeaten SIGMATEL, the intellectual property case that SIGMATEL prosecutes Zhuhai fire force also is absent MP3, and in domain of power source power comsumption, allegedly the period of time of to lodge a complaint, the client of force of many Zhuhai fire converts SIGMATEL, because,very simple everybody does not consider the matter the lawsuit ask for trouble of Zhuhai fire force, this just also is the real reason that SIGMATEL sues Zhuhai fire force, do sth over and over again prosecution of two years is Zhuhai fire force as a result eventually most reconcile in both sides of Shenzhen countercharge SIGMATEL, the judgement that the market share of force of final Zhuhai fire exceeds SIGMATEL to became the MP3 chip provider with the greatest whole world to also prove SIGMATEL is original and be anxious.

这么说来美国电影协会起诉迅雷只能另有目的，这些年西方国家总是在知识产权领域指责中国，前几年珠海炬力被美国MP3芯片提供商SIGMATEL起诉也是因为知识产权，真正的原因确是珠海炬力的迅猛发展已经威胁到SIGMATEL，SIGMATEL起诉珠海炬力的知识产权案也不在MP3，而在电源功耗领域，据说提起诉讼的一段时间，大量珠海炬力的客户都转投SIGMATEL，原因很简单大家都不想因为珠海炬力的官司惹火上身，这也才是SIGMATEL起诉珠海炬力的真正原因，折腾了两年的起诉最终结果是珠海炬力在深圳反诉SIGMATEL双方和解，最后珠海炬力的市场份额超过SIGMATEL成为全球最大的MP3芯片提供商也证实了SIGMATEL最初的判定和担忧。

The paper consists of following contents:(1)starting with a historicalreview of the use-of-force,this paper reveals a paradoxical evolvementof the two trends in use-of-force,compares the absolutization andinfinity with controllability and finity of the use-of-force,and clarifiesnew characteristics of the use-of-force in post-Cold War era;(2)bysystematically analyzing the era background from the viewpoints ofeconomic globalization,political multipole,military high tech,national separatism and the hegemonism,the paper clarifies factorslimiting and stimulating the use-of-force;(3)by analyzing the lawbackground mainly from the viewpoint of international laws,the paperespecially centralizes the discussion on restrictions made by moderninternational laws on the use-of-force and their limits,dissects thechallenges brought up by the high tech war to international laws;(4)the use-of-force by UN and other regional international organization;(5)refuting the theory of"humanitarian intervention"advocated bythe USA and certain western countries,the paper expatiates the rightrelations between human rights and sovereignty,and demonstrates therightness of the sovereignties and UN;(6)the basic guidelines of theuse-of-force in the post-Cold War era.

分别从经济全球化、政治多极化、军事高技术化以及民族分离主义的泛滥、霸权主义的恶性膨胀等方面系统分析冷战后武力使用的时代背景，揭示出冷战后时代同时存在的限制、约束武力使用的因素，以及诱发、刺激武力使用的因素。（3）主要从国际法的角度分析武力使用的法律背景，着重探讨现代国际法对武力使用的规范和制约作用以及这种作用的有限性，同时剖析现代高技术战争对国际法提出的挑战。（4）主要探讨联合国以及区域性国际组织在冷战后使用武力的实践以及存在的问题。（5）驳斥以美国为首的某些西方国家所鼓吹的&人道主义干涉&论，阐述人权与主权的正确关系，论证主权国家和联合国并没有过时，不能用非人道手段解决人道主义问题。（6）系统提出了冷战后国家间使用武力应遵守的基本准则。

与oncoming force相关的网络解释 [注：此内容来源于网络，仅供参考]

force by force：用武力

set fire to sth = set sth on fire 燃烧~ | force by force 用武力 | force sb to do sth = force sb into doing sth 强迫某人做某事

force sb to do sth = force sb into doing sth：强迫某人做某事

force by force 用武力 | force sb to do sth = force sb into doing sth 强迫某人做某事 | first at fitst 首先

triangle of force：力 force 力三角形

刀座鞍;溜板座 saddle | 力 force 力三角形 triangle of force | 力平行四边形 parallelogram of force