law of criminal procedure
- law of criminal procedure的基本解释
-
-
刑事诉讼法
- 更多网络例句与law of criminal procedure相关的网络例句 [注：此内容来源于网络，仅供参考]
-
Definition of false imprisonment regulated by Law of Criminal Procedure is definitely different from that of criminal compensation.
刑事诉讼法中规定的"错误拘留"和刑事赔偿中规定的"错误拘留"的含义是不同的。
-
In accordance with Law of Criminal Procedure, false imprisonment does not necessarily results in state compensation, while false imprisonment in accordance with Law of Criminal Procedure might also become that of criminal compensation.
刑事诉讼法中规定的"错误拘留"不必然引起国家赔偿后果，而符合刑事诉讼法规定的"合法拘留"却可能成为刑事赔偿中的"错误拘留"。
-
He put forwards that the article 4 of crime of L/C fraud in Chinese Criminal Law isn"t in compliance with the principle of penalty according to criminal law, and it will destroy L/C system. The principles of fairness, honest and credibility and prohibition of civil right abuse in General Rules of Civil Law have the feature of indetermination. The litigation of civil right attached to criminal procedure and litigation property save in the Code of Criminal Procedure, in view of their imperfection, cause the repeating capital frozen by police bureau, procuratorate and court. In view of low requirement of civil litigation capital save in Civil Procedure law, the frequent capital frozen happens all the time. Summary of Panel Discussion Concerning Chinese Coastal Area"s Economic and Judicial Work, owing to its low status and evidence"s inexplicitness of issuing ban, results in judger"s unrestrained jurisdiction power. Therefore, this author concludes that the characteristics of fragmentsand imperfection of Chinese L/C laws are disadvantageous to the perfection of the L/C legislation system ,and can not instruct judges to try the cases of L/C fraud effectively.
由于《美国统一商法典》的第五章关于信用证欺诈的规定相对我国法律而言比较完善，笔者在本文对其也作了论述，以期对我国未来的立法有所启示；第三部分主要分析了我国目前的有关信用证欺诈的规定，并指出《刑法》的有关信用证诈骗罪的规定的第4款不符合罪刑法定的要求，它对信用证的运行机制有极强的破坏性；《民法通则》中与信用证欺诈有关的公平、诚实信用、禁止权利滥用原则有其适用时的不确定性；《刑事诉讼法》关于刑事附带民事及诉讼保全的规定，由于规定的不完善，导致公、检、法等各机关对信用证的重复冻结；由于《民事诉讼法》对财产保全的条件要求过低，导致实践中信用证冻结频繁发生；《会谈纪要》由于其效力低和对发布禁令要求的证据并不明确，导致实践中法官的自由裁量权无限扩大。