assembler directive command

assembler directive command的基本解释

-

汇编伪指令

与assembler directive command相关的网络例句 [注：此内容来源于网络，仅供参考]

Chapter 1 is a preface to introduce the motives of this paper research methods scope restriction and frame Chapter 2 will fist introduce the concept of database and then discuss the necessity of database protection in the creating methods and with or without originality This chapter will put emphasis on the importance of originality to database Chapter 3 will observe the British America and Germany's viewpoint of originality to discuss their legislative mode of database legal protection Chapter will introduce EU Directive/96/9/EC of database protection and four judges of EU Court after the Directive takes effect in 2004 to find how the ECJ use the Directive Then according to the DG Internal Market and Service Working Pater and BEUC's evaluation of the Directive this paper will find whether there is positive reaction and influence in database market after EU member countries take the same legislations with the Directive Section 5 will introduce the legislation of British and Germany following the Directive and analyze the development and questions of the two countries' current legislation Chapter 5 will start with Americas case Feist v Jane Doe to understand the case's influence to American legal protection of databases and introduce the Parliament's proposal after the EU Directive Chapter 6 will introduce Japan legislation regarding legal protection of database works and discuss the goodness and badness through Japan academy and judicial viewpoint Chapter 7 will introduce Taiwan's legislation to find whether current law provides enough and adequate protection to databases and discuss whether there is a necessity of amendment At last this paper will try to provide some suggestions about our legislation Chapter 8 is the conclusion of this paper

第二章首先介绍资料库之概念，并以建置方式与是否具原创性区分方式探讨资料库法律保护之必要性，而因著眼原创性对於资料库法律保护之重要性，便於第三章以比较法独立观察英、美、德国对原创性之观点，以接续探讨三国对资料库所采取之立法途径。第四章部份介绍欧盟资料库保护指令之相关规定，并就指令公布后，欧盟法院於2004年接续作出四个关於资料库保护之判决加以介绍，以期寻求欧盟法院如何运用指令规范中之构成要件，而后并参考欧盟委员会工作小组及消费者组织报告对欧体资料库指令之评估文献，探究欧盟各国采取与指令相同立法后，在资料库市场上是否有正面的回应及影响，并於第五节针对英、德两国跟进欧盟资料库保护指令立法之介绍，并归纳、检讨英、德两国之现行法制之发展与所面临之问题。第五章延续第三章、第四章论述后，进入美国1991年Feist案后，美国法院对国内资料库保护之后续见解，探究1991年Feist案对美国资料库保护之影响程度，同时并述美国於欧体公布资料库指令后国会提出之资料库立法草案。第六章则针对日本新增资料库著作之立法模式加以介绍，并藉由日本学界、实务之见解探讨该立法模式之优缺点，再於第七章进入我国法制之介绍，以观察我国目前之法制是否提供资料库充分的保护，探讨资料库立法之必要性，最后尝试提出我国立法模式之建议。第八章则为总结之论述。

Chapter will introduce EU Directive/96/9/EC of database protection and four judges of EU Court after the Directive takes effect in 2004 to find how the ECJ use the Directive. Then, according to the DG Internal Market and Service Working Pater and BEUC's evaluation of the Directive, this paper will find whether there is positive reaction and influence in database market after EU member countries take the same legislations with the Directive. Section 5 will introduce the legislation of British and Germany following the Directive and analyze the development and questions of the two countries' current legislation. Chapter 5 will start with Americas case Feist v.

第四章部份介绍欧盟资料库保护指令之相关规定，并就指令公布后，欧盟法院於2004年接续作出四个关於资料库保护之判决加以介绍，以期寻求欧盟法院如何运用指令规范中之构成要件，而后并参考欧盟委员会工作小组及消费者组织报告对欧体资料库指令之评估文献，探究欧盟各国采取与指令相同立法后，在资料库市场上是否有正面的回应及影响，并於第五节针对英、德两国跟进欧盟资料库保护指令立法之介绍，并归纳、检讨英、德两国之现行法制之发展与所面临之问题。

Command: d Partition number (1-11): 6 Command: n Command action l logical (5 or over) p primary partition (1-4) l First cylinder (5001-20886, default 5001): Using default value 5001 Last cylinder or +size or +sizeM or +sizeK (5001-7500, default 7500): Using default value 7500 Command: p Disk /dev/sda: 171.7 GB, 171798691840 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 20886 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 1 1250 10040593+ 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/sda2 1251 20886 157726170 5 Extended /dev/sda5 1251 2500 10040593+ 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/sda6 7501 10000 20081218+ b W95 FAT32 /dev/sda7 10001 20886 87441763+ 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/sda8 2501 3000 4016218+ 83 Linux /dev/sda9 3001 3125 1004031 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/sda10 3126 5000 15060906 83 Linux /dev/sda11 5001 7500 20081218+ 83 Linux Partition table entries are not in disk order Command: t Partition number (1-11): 11 Hex code: 7 Changed system type of partition 11 to 7 Command: p Disk /dev/sda: 171.7 GB, 171798691840 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 20886 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 1 1250 10040593+ 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/sda2 1251 20886 157726170 5 Extended /dev/sda5 1251 2500 10040593+ 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/sda6 7501 10000 20081218+ c W95 FAT32 /dev/sda7 10001 20886 87441763+ 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/sda8 2501 3000 4016218+ 83 Linux /dev/sda9 3001 3125 1004031 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/sda10 3126 5000 15060906 83 Linux /dev/sda11 5001 7500 20081218+ 7 HPFS/NTFS Partition table entries are not in disk order Command m for help

到这里，就已经将原先的windows的E盘（2501到5000柱面），那个/dev/sda6分成了三个区。现在如果保存分区操作后，再使用格式化工具创建文件系统后，原先的 2501到5000柱面上的数据将丢失。当然，我们不必担心，因为事先已经将文件复制到了其它的地方了。注意：现在有一个问题，看上面/dev/sda11 的尾柱面是 5000 ，而/dev/sda6的首柱面是5001 。一直到/dev/sda8 的首柱面都位于/dev/sda11的尾柱面之后。也就是说它们的物理位置在后面，但分区编号在前面。为改变这一状况，有一个简易的方法。就是先删紧靠 5000柱面之后的一个分区，然后立即按默认首柱面和尾柱面进行分配，在重建分区表的时候注意把分区的系统标识也改也原先的（因为 Linux的fdisk中默认的新建的分区系统标识为id为83。

与assembler directive command相关的网络解释 [注：此内容来源于网络，仅供参考]

assembler directive：组合程序指引

组合程序发展系统 assembler development system | 组合程序指引 assembler directive | 组合程序指引命令 assembler directive command

assembler directive command：组合程序指引命令

组合程序指引 assembler directive | 组合程序指引命令 assembler directive command | 组合程序错误码 assembler error code

Assembler Directive Commands：汇编程序引导指令

assembler code | 汇编码 | assembler directive commands | 汇编程序引导指令 | assembler directive | 汇编命令