Wittgenstein

Wittgenstein的基本解释

-

[电影]维特根斯坦

与Wittgenstein相关的网络例句 [注：此内容来源于网络，仅供参考]

The author would further argue for the theses listed below:(1) Wittgenstein's"phenomenological period"could be regarded as the beginning of his lasting interest in"the philosophy of psychology"into the end of his life, whereas the interest of this kind didn't appear obviously in Tractatus;(2) By interpreting the"atomic propositions"as the simplest description of the data instead of avoiding illustrating what it is as Tractatus did, Wittgenstein's "phenomenological period"does show us an amazing affinity between his own standpoint at that time and that of the Russellian logical atomism, which is surely under the influence of the empiricist tradition;(3) Wittgenstein's critique of his phenomenology, however, revives the celebrated Tractarian dichotomy between"unspeakablity"and"speakablity"in a new context by denying any attempt to employ any linguistic tool to designate or describe the absoluteness of the data which could be only"shown".

本文所试图论证的要点可以被概括为：(1)维氏的"现象学阶段"可以被视为他关于"心理学的哲学"的长期学术兴趣的发端点——这一兴趣一直延续到他生命的终点，却并未体现于其早年作品《逻辑哲学论》之中；(2)通过将"原子命题"解释为对于感觉予料的最简单的描述（而不是像《逻辑哲学论》那样回避对于"原子命题"之所是的正面解说），维氏的"现象学阶段"乃是向我们展现了他该时期的哲学立场与罗素的经验论版本的"逻辑原子主义"之间的令人惊讶的亲缘关系；(3)通过否认任何试图用语言手段来标示或描述予料的企图，并通过对于予料自身的绝对性的展示，维氏对于他自己的"现象学"观念的批判实际上乃是复活了他在《逻辑哲学论》时代就已作出的对于"不可说性"与"可说性"的二分法。

Only under this presupposition, as the author concludes, can Wittgenstein's emphasis on"following a rule"be interfused into a complete"private language argument";(9) Finally, this dissertation would tell the readers why later Wittgenstein cannot be interpreted as a vulgar relativist who only acknowledges the relative validity of the linguistic rules obeyed in a certain community and who cancels out the status of the impressions in our language-games on impressions, since what Wittgenstein denies is not the existence of the impressions but just the speakability of them.

本文认为，只有在理解这一前提的情况下，我们才能将维氏对于&遵从规则&的强调熔铸到一个完整的&私人语言论证&中去；(9)最后，本文将向读者说明为什么后期维氏并不能被解释为一个粗俗的相对主义者，即只愿意承认在一个特定共同体中被遵守的语言规则的相对效用，并主张在关于感觉的语言游戏中去删除感觉所应占据的地位——因为维氏所拒斥的只是感觉印象的可说性，而非这些印象的存在本身。

The author would further argue for the theses listed below:(1) Wittgenstein's"phenomenological period"could be regarded as the beginning of his lasting interest in"the philosophy of psychology"into the end of his life, whereas the interest of this kind didn't appear obviously in Tractatus;(2) By interpreting the"atomic propositions"as the simplest description of the data instead of avoiding illustrating what it is as Tractatus did, Wittgenstein's "phenomenological period"does show us an amazing affinity between his own standpoint at that time and that of the Russellian logical atomism, which is surely under the influence of the empiricist tradition;(3) Wittgenstein's critique of his phenomenology, however, revives the celebrated Tractarian dichotomy between"unspeakablity"and"speakablity"in a new context by denying any attempt to employ any linguistic tool to designate or describe the absoluteness of the data which could be only"shown".

本文所试图论证的要点可以被概括为：(1)维氏的&现象学阶段&可以被视为他关于&心理学的哲学&的长期学术兴趣的发端点——这一兴趣一直延续到他生命的终点，却并未体现于其早年作品《逻辑哲学论》之中；(2)通过将&原子命题&解释为对于感觉予料的最简单的描述（而不是像《逻辑哲学论》那样回避对于&原子命题&之所是的正面解说），维氏的&现象学阶段&乃是向我们展现了他该时期的哲学立场与罗素的经验论版本的&逻辑原子主义&之间的令人惊讶的亲缘关系；(3)通过否认任何试图用语言手段来标示或描述予料的企图，并通过对于予料自身的绝对性的展示，维氏对于他自己的&现象学&观念的批判实际上乃是复活了他在《逻辑哲学论》时代就已作出的对于&不可说性&与&可说性&的二分法。

与Wittgenstein相关的网络解释 [注：此内容来源于网络，仅供参考]

Wittgenstein：维根斯坦

用法论是由哲学家维根斯坦(Wittgenstein)提出的. 他认为,"一个词的意义,在多数情况下,是由它在语言中的用法来决定的". 从用法论的角度来看,要了解意义,就必须了解言语行为.

Wittgenstein：维特根斯坦

"维特根 斯坦(Wittgenstein)说得更绝:"凡是隐藏着的......我们都不感兴趣. "我不想把话说 绝. 我认为,我们总是在寻求某种隐藏着的,或者潜在的,或者设想中的东西,只要这 些东西出现在表层,我们就要追踪. 我认为,

Wittgenstein：年 维特根斯坦

>(Wittgenstein)直到最后一部影片他去世前不久拍摄的>(Blue)在拍摄电影的同时他向世界公布了他的病情闻名的影评人尼古拉斯.容(Nicholas de Jongh)很为此动容他一直住在伦敦西区(West End)的一间窄小的居室中也有索霍(Soho)区形形色色的色情商店厕净冲渗透下水道"这是德瑞

Wittgenstein, Ludwig：维特根斯坦

威斯顿 Wisdom, J. | 维特根斯坦 Wittgenstein, Ludwig | 魏斯曼 Waismann, F

Wittgenstein, Ludwig：维特根斯坦,路德维希

Witheing,William 威塞林,威廉 | Wittgenstein,Ludwig 维特根斯坦,路德维希 | Wholer,Friedrich 维勒,弗里德里希